期刊文献+

作格研究述评 被引量:32

A review of research on ergativity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于作格研究近50年来在国内外的发展现状,从以下五个方面梳理各家各派对于作格含义的认识:(1)类型学家从形态标记的角度看作格,(2)生成语法派从动词分类角度看作格,(3)功能学派侧重于及物关系和作格关系的探讨,(4)认知语言学从认知角度谈作格,(5)汉语学术界对汉语作格现象的研究。 This article presents a review of the research on ergativity in the past fifty years or so. Five different schools of linguistics are examined for their views on ergativity, which include the following: (1) typologists' approach to ergative languages from the perspective of morphological markers; (2) transformational grammarians' analyses of ergative verbs based on verb classes; (3) functionalists' study of the relation between transitive and ergative constructions; (4) cognitive linguists' investigation into ergativity from the cognitive perspective; and (5) Chinese linguists' discussion of ergatvity.
作者 曾立英
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第4期424-432,共9页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目973项目(2004CB318102)支持 教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(06JC740006)的支持。
  • 相关文献

参考文献57

  • 1Anderson, J. 1968. Ergative and nominative in English[J]. Journal of Linguistics 4: 1-32. 被引量:1
  • 2Belletti, A. 1988. The case of unaccusatives[J]. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1: 1-34. 被引量:1
  • 3Brainard, S. 1997. Ergativity and grammatical relations in Karao [A]. In T. Givon (ed.). Grammatical Relations : A Functionalist Perspective [C]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 被引量:1
  • 4Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government- Binding Approach [M]. Dordrecht: Reidel. 被引量:1
  • 5Cheng, L. L. -Shen & Huang, C.-T. James. 1994. On the argument structure of resultative compounds [A]. In Matthew Y. Chen & Ovid J. L. Tzeng (eds.). In honor of William S-Y. Wang: Interdisciplinary Studies on Language and Language Change[C]. Taipei: Pryamid Press. 被引量:1
  • 6Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology[M].沈家煊(译),1989,《语言共性和语言类型》.北京:华夏出版社. 被引量:1
  • 7Croft, W. 1990/2002. Typology and Universals (second edition) [M]. Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 8Davidse, K. 1992. Transitivity/ergativity: The Janusheaded grammar of actions and events [A]. In D. Martin & R. Louise (eds.). Advances in Systemic Linguistics[C]. London: Printer Publishers, 105-35. 被引量:1
  • 9Davison, A. 1999. Ergativity: Functional and formal issues[A]. In M. Darnel (ed.). Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics I [C]. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 被引量:1
  • 10DeLancey, S. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns [J]. Language 57: 626-57. 被引量:1

二级参考文献283

共引文献763

同被引文献285

引证文献32

二级引证文献272

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部