期刊文献+

腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术28例报告 被引量:13

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy:with a report of 28 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术的临床疗效。方法:对采用腹膜后腹腔镜手术治疗的28例输尿管中上段结石患者的资料进行分析。结果:28例手术均获成功,手术时间80~150min,平均115min,术中出血量20~60ml,平均35ml。术后住院5~7d。术中腹膜破裂2例,术后漏尿1例。26例随访3~18个月,无输尿管切开处狭窄及结石复发。结论:腹膜后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术安全、有效、微创,值得临床推广应用。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical efficacy of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.Methods:The data of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy performed in 28 patients with middle or upper ureteral calculus were analyzed.Results:All the operations were successfully.The operating time was 80-150min(mean 115min).The intraoperative blood loss was 20-60ml(mean 35ml).And the postoperative hospitalization was 5-7d.The intraoperative rupture of the peritoneum was encountered in 2 patients,and the postoperative urinary leakage in one patient.No complication was observed during a follow-up period for 3-18 months in 26 cases.Conclusions:Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is with the advantage of safety,minimal invasion and efficacy.
机构地区 河南省职工医院
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2007年第5期402-403,共2页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜术 输尿管结石 腹膜后 Laparoscopy Ureteral calculus Retroperitoneal
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献17

  • 1黄群联,韩杰,姜书传,卓栋.输尿管镜气压弹道碎石治疗输尿管结石110例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2005,5(8):661-661. 被引量:12
  • 2Omid R, Paulos Y, Gopal H. Badlani. Does laparoscopic ureterolithotomy replace shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for ureteral stones. Curr Opin Urol, 2001, 11: 287-291. 被引量:1
  • 3Hemal A K, Goel A, Goel R. Minimally invasive retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy. J Urol,2003,169:480-482. 被引量:1
  • 4Gaur D D, Trivedi S, Prahudesai M R,et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU International, 2002, 89: 339-343. 被引量:1
  • 5Daniel J, Painter, Francis X, et al. New concepts in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Current Opinion in Urology,2001, 11: 373-378. 被引量:1
  • 6Park H, Park M, Park T. Two year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol, 1998, 12:501-504. 被引量:1
  • 7Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree G K, et al. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol, 1996,49: 86-91. 被引量:1
  • 8Jackman S V,Docimo S G, Cadeddu J A, et al. The mini-pere' technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 1998,16 : 371-374. 被引量:1
  • 9Lahme S,Bichler K H,Strohmaire W H, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol, 2001, 40:619-624. 被引量:1
  • 10Maheshwar P N, Oswal A T, Andankar M, et al. Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol, 1999, 13: 441-444. 被引量:1

共引文献311

同被引文献76

引证文献13

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部