期刊文献+

探索汉语隐喻计算化研究之路 被引量:4

Chinese Metaphor Computation: The State of Art
下载PDF
导出
摘要 隐喻现象是思维及语言的中心问题,而隐喻的机器理解若不能得到有效解决,将会成为制约自然语言理解和机器翻译技术发展的瓶颈,因此,隐喻的计算化研究成为自然语言处理的一个重要问题。相对于英语隐喻计算研究,汉语隐喻计算研究才刚刚起步。根据本体、喻体和相似性关系三者的认知结构,可以把汉语隐喻分为九种类别;在此基础上,隐喻网络模型的建构为汉语隐喻句的机器识别和分类算法提供了形式化方法;此外,从解决逻辑全知问题和隐喻的语义真值角度提出的汉语隐喻逻辑系统,则为汉语隐喻句的释义提供了很好的支持。在今后的研究工作中,还需加强隐喻分类识别研究,建立隐喻属性知识库,构建汉语隐喻的认知类比描述与转绎系统,改造汉英机器翻译系统并对面向隐喻的搜索引擎进行升级。 Metaphor, an ordinary everyday phenomenon of language use, has become the focus of mind and language mechanism. The comprehension of metaphor by machine will be a bottleneck problem in natural language understanding and machine translation. Therefore, great attention has been paid to computational mechanisms of metaphor within the last few decades, with respect to cognitive mechanism, machine understanding, machine recognition, application, etc. Although metaphor computation may encounter many problems for the rich expressive power of natural language and cognitive nature of human being, scientists still have achieved a lot on constructing computational models of metaphor. In fact, most of the current achievements are limited to the English language, whereas research on Chinese metaphor computation has just got started. In this paper, the author attempts to make a summary of the research results concerning Chinese metaphor computation that have been achieved in recent years, and suggests reconsidering the existing problems and limitations revealed in the study, and makes proposals for further research on computational mechanisms of metaphor in general. Specifically, achievements in the study of Chinese metaphor computation have been scored from three main perspectives, i. e., categorization architecture, machine recognition and classification, logic representation and interpretation of metaphor. Firstly, based on the view of cognitive structures on the relations among tenor, vehicle and the similarity between them in a metaphor, we have put forward a system of Chinese metaphor categorization architecture, according to which there are altogether nine types of Chinese metaphor. Statistical verification and linguistic explanation are also proposed to support this categorization. Secondly, we have constructed a computational model of metaphor representation, called metaphorical semantic network (MSN), according to the characteristics of metaphor. This model offers methods to formalize Chinese sentences, and
作者 周昌乐
出处 《浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2007年第5期43-50,共8页 Journal of Zhejiang University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(60373080) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(04BZX045) 国家哲学社会科学创新基地"语言与认知研究"资助项目(205000-811342)
关键词 汉语隐喻 自然语言理解 计算模型 隐喻逻辑 Chinese metaphor natural language processing computational model metaphor logic
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1周昌乐编著..心脑计算举要[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2003:237.
  • 2束定芳著..隐喻学研究[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000:267.
  • 3Lakoff,G.,Johnson,M.Metaphors We Live By[M].Chicago:The University of Chicago Press,1980. 被引量:1
  • 4Gentner,D.Structure-Mapping:A Theoretical Framework for Analogy[J].Cognitive Science,1983,(7):155-170. 被引量:1
  • 5Falkenhainer,B.,Forbus,K.D.,Gentner,D.The Structure-Mapping Engine:Algorithm and Examples[J].Artificial Intelligence,1989,(41):1-63. 被引量:1
  • 6Lakoff,G.The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor[A].Ortony,A.Metaphor and Thought[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993. 被引量:1
  • 7Ahrens,K.When Love is not Digested:Underlying Reasons for Source to Target Domain Pairing in the Contemporary Theory of Metaphor[M].Taipei:Proceedings of the First Cognitive Linguistics Conference,2002. 被引量:1
  • 8Searle,J.R.Metaphor[A].Ortony,A.Metaphor and Thought[C].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1993. 被引量:1
  • 9林书武.国外隐喻研究综述[J].外语教学与研究,1997,29(1):14-22. 被引量:279
  • 10冯晓虎著..隐喻 思维的基础 篇章的框架[M].北京:对外经济贸易大学出版社,2004:279.

二级参考文献31

  • 1胡壮麟.语言·认知·隐喻[J].现代外语,1997,20(4). 被引量:347
  • 2杨成虎.隐喻研究背景下修辞格的重新归类问题[J].四川外语学院学报,2002,18(1):90-92. 被引量:7
  • 3周红,文远.英汉情感隐喻共性分析[J].四川外语学院学报,2001,17(3):90-92. 被引量:44
  • 4James H.Martin.A Computational Model of Metaphor Inerpretation[M].Academic Press,Inc.Harcourt Brace Jovanovich,Publishers.1990. 被引量:1
  • 5Rickheit, Gert. Habel, Christopher. Mental Models in discourse Processing and reasoning[M]. Amsterdam, New York: North-Holland, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 6Searle, John. R, 1982, Metaphor, in Davis, S. (ed) [ C ]. Pragmatics: A reader, Oxford University Press, 1991. 被引量:1
  • 7Fagin,Ronald. Halpern,J. Y. Belief, Awareness, and Limited Reasoning[J]. Artificial intelligence, 1988, Vol.34:39 - 76. 被引量:1
  • 8Lakoff, George. Johnson, Mark. Metaphors we live by[M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980. 被引量:1
  • 9Richards, Ivor Armstrong, The philosophy of rhetoric[ C ]. (selected works of Richards from 1919- 1938 ), New York: Routledge, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 10Martin J H. A Computational Model of Metaphor Interpretation.Boston, Academic Press,1990 被引量:1

共引文献307

同被引文献46

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部