期刊文献+

公司治理与资本效益:模型与实证

Corporate Governance and Capital Efficiency: on Empirical Analysis and Modelling
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文旨在探讨公司治理因子与资本效益的关系。理论模型分析表明,若要提高公司的总资产周转率和资本效益,必须有效抑制经营者对津贴的追求度和强化投资者的价值最大化惩治力度。中国上市公司的数据充分说明公司治理机制欠缺的代理成本不会低于9%,各代理变量的实证分析也证明公司的生产效率和资本效益与经营者重视投资者利益的程度存在正向关系,与经营者追求自身利益最大化的自由度存在反向关系。因此为防止多重道德风险和逆向选择通过金融系统作用于公司治理机制,应对资本市场进行整体设计和对银行制度进行彻底改革。 This paper tries to explore the relationship between corporate governance and capital efficiency. The Analytical Model shows that the total turnover capital and the increase of efficiency, we must restrain gaining allowances by operators and reinforce the punishment to the investors seeking maximum the value. The data of China's listed companies corporate governance mechanism shows fully the lack agency cost is not less than 9%. An Empirical Analysis of the variables also prove that the company's production efficiency and effectiveness of capital importance to the interests of investors and operators to the extent there are positive, with the operator to maximize the freedom to pursue their own interests inverse relationship exists. Thus, to prevent multiple adverse selection and moral hazard role in corporate governance mechanisms through the financial system. It is necessary to design capital market and do the radical reform of the banking system.
作者 楚尔鸣
出处 《系统工程》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第5期35-42,共8页 Systems Engineering
基金 湖南省社科基金资助项目(05BR17)
关键词 公司治理 资本效益 代理成本 Corporate Governance Capital Endowment Agent Cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献85

  • 1陈小悦,徐晓东.股权结构、企业绩效与投资者利益保护[J].经济研究,2001,36(11):3-11. 被引量:785
  • 2刘小玄,李利英.企业产权变革的效率分析[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):4-16. 被引量:144
  • 3《“郎咸平旋风”掀起国有企业改革大论争》.张问敏等编.《中国经济大论战》第10辑,经济科学出版社,2005年,第43—47页. 被引量:1
  • 4Roman Frydman, Cheryl Gray, Marek Hessel and Andrei Rapaczynski, When Does Privatization Work:The Impact of Private Ownership on Corporate Performance in the Transition Economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (4): 1999. pp. 1153-91. 被引量:1
  • 5Stijn Claessens, Simeon Djankov and Gerhard Pohl, Ownership Structure and Corporate Performance: Evidence from the Czech Republic. mimeo, World Bank, 1997. 被引量:1
  • 6Stephen C. Smith,Beon-Cheol Cin and Milan Vodopivec, Privatization Incidence, Ownership Forms, and Firm Performance: Evidence from Slovenia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 25: 1997,pp. 158-179. 被引量:1
  • 7Yifan Hu, Frank Song and Junxi Zhang, Does Privatization Work in China? Working Paper 2005,School of Economics and Finance, University of Hong Kong. 被引量:1
  • 8Bai, Chong-en, Qiao Liu, Joe Lu, Frank Song and Junxi Zhang, Corporate Governance and Firm Valuations in Chinese Listed Companies. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32: 2004, pp. 599-616 被引量:1
  • 9Xiaonian Xu and Wang Yan, Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance in Chinese Stock Companies.China Economic Review, 101 1999, pp. 75-98. 被引量:1
  • 10Daqing Qi, Woody Wu and Hua Zhang, Shareholding Structure and Corporate Performance of Partially Privatized Firms: Evidence from Listed Chinese Companies. Pacific Bain Finance Journal, 8: 2000,pp. 587-610. 被引量:1

共引文献142

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部