摘要
单指标监测法比较简单,但客观性较差,相比较而言,综合评价法更加科学、合理。但现有的两种城乡一体化综合评价法存在构建指标体系立足点、标准值选择、赋权方法、综合评价模型的不同,造成了评价结论的差异。通过对现有评价方法进行完善,可得出更加合理的结论。
Comprehensive-evaluation method is more scientific and rational than single-index monitoring method. The latter is simple, but it lacks of objectivity. And the two existing methods about the integration of urban and rural development process have some differences in the building of index system, the choice of standard value, methods of allocating weights and comprehensive-evaluation models that make the differences of evaluating conclusion. We can draw more reasonable conclusion through improvement of existing evaluation-methods.
出处
《山东工商学院学报》
2007年第4期81-86,共6页
Journal of Shandong Technology and Business University
关键词
综合评价
城乡一体化
城乡差距
“五个统筹”
comprehensive evaluation
the integration of urban and rural development
the difference between city and countryside
＂Five Coordination＂
