摘要
近年来,我国社科期刊正处在转型前的“躁动”之中。从期刊的主管者、主办者到办刊人以及服务对象都在热议一系列的改革问题,并且对这些热门问题大多形成了“共识”。然而仔细分析,这些共识大多模棱两可或似是而非。由此造成了变革的主体——社科期刊面临诸多两难选择:综合性还是专业性;全面出击还是有所取舍;开门办刊还是自我封闭;依靠专家还是编辑办刊;重选题策划还是重文字编校;匿名审稿还是编辑审稿;执行编排规范还是执行评价规范;重评价指标还是重独立风格;纸质版还是电子版;面向市场还是拒绝经营等等。一切似乎都有了答案,但付诸行动时方知事情并不像已有的答案那么简单。因此,大多社科期刊不得不徘徊于变革的十字路口,选择了“骑墙”这一姿态。这是正常现象,不足为怪,毕竟转型的序幕已经拉开。
In recent years, journals of social sciences in China are experiencing labor pains. From top to bottom, people involved are all engaged in arguing for the changes, and they seemingly come to a consensus of opinion. A careful examination, however, may show the ambiguity of the ＂consensus＂, which indeed brings the journals into such dilemmas as being comprehensive or professional, expert-dependency or self-dependency, open to the market or restricted to small high circles, blind review or not and the like. Answers to these difficult problems seem to be ready, but practice proves no easy job. As a result, transformation comes to a crossroad. A wait-and-see strategy is simply normal. After all, changes are on their way.
出处
《清华大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第4期70-89,共20页
Journal of Tsinghua University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
社科期刊
转型
两难选择
journals of social sciences
transformation
dilemmas
