摘要
中国法学受着一种源自西方的"现代化范式"支配,只有充分、坚实地证明当下中国法学已经从根本上无力解释和解决中国法律实践中所存在的基本问题或关键问题,才能断言中国法学存在着总体性危机。邓正来先生并没有有效进行这种证明,无法断言中国法学存在着总体性危机,"中国法学向何处去"就是"无问而问",即便不是一个假问题,在它的提出理路里也很难被认为是一个真问题。邓正来先生并没有给出"中国法律理想图景"或"邓正来的中国法律理想图景",他并没有真正回答"中国法学向何处去"这一问题,但是在他的论述中给出了一个问题解决套路。因种种原因,该问题解决套路的有效性十分可疑。经过邓先生的立论和笔者的驳论,显示出一些对中国法学发展可能有意义的问题。
The jurisprudence of China is controlled by a ＂modernized paradigm＂ arising from the western. It is must be proved fully and affirmably that the current jurisprudence of China should not explain and solve the basic or key problems at all, then we could allege its holistic crisis. DENG Zhenglai doesn ＇ t make it proved effectively so that the crisis of the jurisprudence of China should not be claimed. And the question of ＂where to go for the jurisprudence of China＂ is a ＂question of no-question＂. Though not a fake question, it should not be taken as a true question by its discussion way. Mr. DENG does not provide for us by a discussion of ＂China＇s legal ambition prospect＂ or a ＂China＇s legal ambition prospect of DENG Zhenglai＇, so he does not answer the questionof ＂where to go for the jurisprudence of China＂, but a model method to solve the question is given in his speech, which is suspicious in its validity for some reasons. Some possible meaningful questions are displayed after the advocacy of Deng Zhenglai and the elenchus of mine.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第9期163-168,共6页
Hebei Law Science
关键词
总体性危机
西化之中国
中国法律实践现实
问题解决套路
有效性危机
holistic crisis
being-westemed China
the reality of China legal practice
the model method to solve question
crisis of vality
