摘要
人们的行动不是基于单纯的手段-目的理性,也不会完全受到结构性约束之摆布。通过对纳西族社会中发生的“殉情”历史事件、彝族的“死给”制度等个案考察,将表明暴力性私力救济的发生不仅和规则、资源、现有的纠纷解决机制等社会的客观维度有关联,它还与人们关于生活意义的思考、信仰和价值等主观方面有关系。人们的信仰、价值、意义追寻促成了暴力性私力救济。暴力性私力救济不能完全被消除,只能被限制和减少。但是,治理暴力性私力救济不能从强制改变人们的主观信念入手,只能着手于制度建构,消除引发暴力性私力救济客观因素。
Peopie＇s action is neither purely based on the purpose of means -ends rationality, nor completely controlled by structural limitations. Occurrence of violent self - help is related to many objective factors, such as existing rules, resources and dispute settlement mechanism. It also can be influenced and caused by some subjective factors people＇s reflection on life significance, belief and value. However, to regulate violent self - help should focus on institution construction rather than coercive measures of forcing people to change subjective faith.
出处
《云南大学学报（法学版）》
2007年第3期178-187,共10页
Jorunal of Yunan University Law Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金项目"边疆多民族地区和谐社会的法治构建"(批准号:06CFX006
主持人王启梁)
云南大学人文社会科学2005年度项目"和谐社会的法治构建"(主持人王启梁)
关键词
暴力性私力救济
意义
社会控制
法律社会学
自杀
violent self - help
significance
social control
legal sociology
suicide
