摘要
西方法治国家对未决羁押普遍实行司法审查,并且体现诉讼三角结构的特点,因此,该制度能较好地保护犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法权益。而我国未决羁押审查的非司法化加之其他配套制度的缺乏,导致在司法实践中侵犯犯罪嫌疑人、被告人合法权益的事件时有发生。因此完善该制度,应从改革现行强制措施体系入手,实行羁押与逮捕分离,并且在羁押审查程序中引入司法审查,即由人民法院采取听证的形式行使羁押的决定权。
Judicial review is normally carried over the unconvicted detention in the western countries ruled by law and it embodies the triangle-structured features of procedure. Therefore, the system can well protect the human rights of criminal suspects and defendants. But the non-justice of this system and the lack of other supplementary systems lead to the frequent occurrence of violation of criminal suspects and defendants＇ rights. So, it＇s necessary to improve this system by reforming the current compulsive measures, separating detention from arrest and carrying out judicial review during detention review proceeding, that is, it＇s the People＇s Court that exerts the decisive power of detention by holding a hearing on detention.
出处
《江西教育学院学报》
2007年第2期18-22,共5页
Journal of Jiangxi Institute of Education
基金
江西省高校人文社会科学研究项目<我国未决羁押制度的实证研究>(编号:Fx0601)的阶段性成果
关键词
未决羁押
司法审查
人民法院
羁押听证
unconvicted detention
judicial review
People＇ Court
hearing on detention
