摘要
证明标准是证据制度中证明理论的核心内容,也是司法实践中证据运用的首要问题。作为指导和规范刑事证明活动准则的刑事证明标准,应当根据刑事证明逐步深入的特点,构建出由低到高"阶梯式"的层次性证明标准。作为刑事证明的最高标准,即有罪判决的证明标准之确立,是近年来学界争论的焦点。因此,深入研究证明标准的涵义,比较两大法系刑事证明的最高标准,分析国内有关刑事证明标准的各种学说,反思我国有罪判决证明标准的立法规定,以期重新构建顺应时代发展潮流、符合我国刑事司法实际情况和需要的科学、理性、可操作性的刑事证明的最高标准。
Standard of proof is not only the core of the proof theory, but also a question of first importance in the application of proof in judicial practice. As the instruction and the standard criminal proof criterion criminal proof standard, must act according to the criminal proof gradually thorough characteristic, constructs from low to high ＂the steps and ladders type＂ layered proof standard. How to establish the standard of proof of guilt, which is the highest standard of criminal testification, is the central issue of related debates in educational circles. Therefore, we studies the proof standard thoroughly the implication, compared with the two major legal system＇s highest standards of criminal testification, analysis domestic doctrines of standard of criminal testification, and reconsidering the provision in our country on standard of proof of guilt, in the hope of reestablishing a scientific, rational and operational criminal testification＇s highest standard, which conforms to the trend of the times, and the judicial practice and requirement.
出处
《法学论坛》
北大核心
2007年第3期97-103,共7页
Legal Forum
关键词
刑事证明
最高标准
反思
重构
criminal proof
highest standard
standard of proof
the highest
reconsider
reestablish
