期刊文献+

喷砂技术对牙釉质和正畸托槽间黏结强度的影响 被引量:6

The Effect of Sandblasting on the Band Strength between Enamel and Bracket
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察牙釉质和托槽底板用喷砂技术表面处理后与复合树脂黏结的效果。方法80颗人类前磨牙随机分为4组,均采用复合树脂黏结托槽。对照组(A组)根据产品使用说明黏结;喷砂组对托槽底部(B组)、釉质表面(C组)分别喷砂或同时(D组)进行喷砂处理后再做常规黏结。记录抗剪切强度和残留黏合剂指数(ARI)。结果酸蚀前用喷砂机对牙釉质和托槽底板表面分别进行喷砂处理的D组与A组、B组、C组之间的总体剪切强度和ARI记分差异有统计学意义。A组与B组、C组;B组与D组两两比较的剪切强度差异没有统计学意义。托槽底板和牙釉质表面同时经喷砂处理后获得了较高的黏结强度和较低的ARI记分。结论对托槽底板和牙釉质表面同时喷吵处理可提高两者间黏结强度。 Objective To evaluate the adhesive effect of enamel and bracket prepared with sand blasting on surface. Methods Eighty extracted human premolars were randomly divided into 4 groups. Brackets were bonded with composite resin according to two protocols. The brackets were bonded as reeommended by the manufaetttre in the control group (group A). In the sandblasting groups did the same treatment after sand blasting on brackets (group B), enamel (group C) and both (group D) respectively. The shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index (ARI) score were recorded. Results There were statistically significant differences between group D and the others, both in shear bond strength and ARI score. Conclusion A higher bond strength may be obtained by sand blasting on brackets and enamel.
出处 《广东牙病防治》 2007年第4期155-157,共3页 Journal of Dental Prevention and Treatment
关键词 喷砂 黏接剂残留指数 正畸托槽 牙釉质 抗剪切强度 Sandblasting Adhesive remnant index Bracket Dental enamel Shear bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1郑铁丽,黄翠,张智星,王飒,张帼.离体牙储存方式对牙本质黏结剂微拉伸强度的影响[J].上海口腔医学,2005,14(2):147-150. 被引量:20
  • 2冶录平,罗颂椒.不同酸蚀时间托槽与牙面间抗拉粘接力研究[J].华西口腔医学杂志,2003,21(3):189-190. 被引量:13
  • 3KINCH A P,TAYLOR H.A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding,comparing etch times of 15 and 60 seconds.Am J Orthod,1989,95(5):415-421. 被引量:1
  • 4BUONOCORE M G.A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acry-lic filling material to enamel surface.J Dent Res,1955,34(8):849-853. 被引量:1
  • 5RETIEF D H.SADOWSKY P L.Clinical experience with the acid-etch technique in orthodontics.Am J Ortho Dentofac Orthop,1975,68(6):645-654. 被引量:1
  • 6NEWMAN G V,NEWMAN R A,SENGUPTA A K.Comparative assessment of light-cured resin-modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesive:In vitro study of a new adhesive system.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2001,119(3):256-262. 被引量:1
  • 7CARPENTER M A,GOODKIND R J.Effect of varying surface texture on bond strength of one semiprecious and noprecious ceramic-alloy.J Prosthet Dent,1979,42(1):86-95. 被引量:1
  • 8SADOUN M,ASMUSSEN E.Bonding of resin cements to an aluminous ceramic:a new surface treatment.Dent Materials,1994,10(3):185-189. 被引量:1
  • 9DENIZ S.Shear bond strength of resin luting cement to glass infill treated porous aluminum oxide cores.J Prosthet Dent,2000,83(2):210-215. 被引量:1
  • 10翟俊辉,房伯君,肖艳玲.喷砂对托槽粘接的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2003,17(6):549-550. 被引量:7

二级参考文献34

  • 1姜涛,王景云,徐经伟,孙宏晨,孙伟.UB-I粘结剂粘结面的微形态观察[J].口腔医学研究,2004,20(3):277-279. 被引量:1
  • 2陈振琦,彭适生.含氟牙釉质粘接剂剪切强度的研究[J].口腔正畸学,2000,7(2):92-93. 被引量:4
  • 3Diedrich P. Enamel alterations from bracket bonding and debonding:A study with the scanning electron microscope. Am J Orthod, 1981,79(5) :500-522. 被引量:1
  • 4Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques. Am J Orthod, 1980, 77(3): 269-283. 被引量:1
  • 5Brobakken GO, Zachrisson BU. Abrasive wear of bonding adhesives: Studies during treatment and after bracket removal. Am J Orthod, 1981, 79(2) : 134-147. 被引量:1
  • 6Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod,1984, 85(4) :333-340. 被引量:1
  • 7Hoffmen S, Mlewen WS, Drew CM. Scanning electron microcopy studies of dental enamel. J Dent Res, 1969,48(2):242-250. 被引量:1
  • 8Kinch AP, Taylor H. A clinical study of amount of adhesive remaining on enamel after debonding, comparing etch times of 15 and 60. seconds. Am J Orthod, 1989, 95(5): 415-421. 被引量:1
  • 9Nordenvall KL, Brannstromm M, Malmgren O. Etching of deciduous teeth and young and old premenent teeth: A comparison between 15 and 60 seconds of etching. Am J Orthod, 1980, 78( 1 ) : 99-108. 被引量:1
  • 10Newman GV, Newman RA, Sengupta AK. Comparative assesmaent of lingt - cured resin - modified glass ionomer and composite resin adhesive:. In vitro study of a new adhesive system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthp, 2001,119: 256 - 62. 被引量:1

共引文献37

同被引文献83

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部