期刊文献+

4种黏结材料与氧化锆陶瓷黏结剪切强度的比较 被引量:5

Comparative study of bond strength between zirconia ceramics and 4 luting cements
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨适合牙科氧化锆陶瓷的黏结材料。方法:将烧结后的氧化锆陶瓷片分为4组,每组16片,分别采用RelyXTM ARC、PanaviaTM F、RelyXTM Luting、Fuji plus4种黏结材料与喷砂后的氧化锆陶瓷片黏结,水浴24h和水浴30d后,测试其黏结剪切强度,数据用SAS6.12软件进行统计学分析,黏结断面用扫描电镜观察。结果:PanaviaTMF树脂黏结材料黏结强度最好,分别为(34.7±3.44)MPa(水浴24h)、(31.5±3.44)MPa(水浴30d),与其他组黏结强度差别有统计学意义(P<0.01)。RelyXTM Luting,Fuji plus2种树脂改良型玻璃离子可以获得较好的初期(水浴24h)黏结强度,分别为(15.5±2.71)MPa和(16.0±1.77)MPa,但水浴30d后明显下降至(6.80±1.24)MPa和(3.38±2.32)MPa,P<0.05。结论:含有MDP磷酸单体的树脂黏结材料可以使牙科氧化锆陶瓷获得最好的黏结效果,使用树脂改良型玻璃离子可以产生较好的初期黏结强度,但黏结效果不能持久。 PURPOSE: To study the bonding strength of zirconia ceramics with 4 kinds of luting cement materials. MEHTODS: Blocks of sintered zirconia ceramics were cut and randomly divided into 4 groups with 16 slices in each group. They were treated with sandblasting and bonded with 4 kinds of luting cements respectively. After preserved in 37℃ distilled-water for 24 hours and 30 days, the shear bonding strength of these specimens was tested and the data were analyzed by SAS6.12 software package and bond section were observed by scanning electron microscope. RESULTS: Two-way ANOVA revealed that the group of Panavia^TMF could attain the highest shear bonding strength: (34.7±3.44)MPa (after 24 hours), (31.5±3.44) MPa(after lmonth), which was significantly different from other treatment methods (P〈0.01). The initial shear bonding strength of the groups of resin-reinforced glass ionomer was (15.5±2.71 )MPa, (16.0± 1.77)MPa (after 24 hours) but dropped markedly to (6.80±1.24)MPa, (3.38±2.32)MPa after 30 days(P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Resin luting cement containing phosphate monomer (MDP) can provide zirconia ceramics a strong and long-lasting bonding. Resin-reinforced glass ionomer can get good bonding strength too, but can't last long.
出处 《上海口腔医学》 CAS CSCD 2007年第1期73-76,共4页 Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
关键词 树脂黏结剂 氧化锆陶瓷 黏结剪切强度 Resin luting cement Zirconia ceramics Shear bond strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1盛相军,金志浩,王永兰.氧化锆用于牙修复的研究进展[J].硅酸盐通报,2003,22(5):74-77. 被引量:19
  • 2van Dijken JW.Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and selfcured resin composite luted ceramic inlays.A 5-year clinical evaluation[J].Dent Mater,2003,19(7):670-674. 被引量:1
  • 3Ozcana M,Vallitt PK.Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics[J].Dent Mater,2003,19:725-731. 被引量:1
  • 4陈治清.口腔粘结学[M].北京:北京医科大学中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1992:17-18. 被引量:7
  • 5Kern M,Wegner SM.Bonding to zirconia ceramic:adhesion methods and their durability[J].Dent Mater,1998,14:64-71. 被引量:1
  • 6Uo M,Sjoren G,Sundh A,et al.Cytotoxicity and bonding property of dental ceramics[J].Dent Mater,2003,19:487-492. 被引量:1
  • 7Irie M,Suzuki K,Watts DC.Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement,with early finishing and water storage[J].Dent Mater,2004,20:3-11. 被引量:1

二级参考文献3

共引文献24

同被引文献61

引证文献5

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部