摘要
强调个体和人类价值的世界主义以及强调国家价值的社群主义是国际关系规范的两种主要思想传统。在较长时期内,两者之间的争论构成了国际关系规范理论发展的主要线索与内容。然而,在20世纪的最后十年中,世界主义与社群主义两种传统都受到了来自后现代主义的猛烈批评,其结果是反基础主义的兴起。反基础主义质疑价值基础的客观性与必要性,从而成为一种没有伦理规范的道德主义。反基础主义的批判意义是勿庸置疑的,但由于其作用仅限于解构而非建构,因而很难在解释与改造世界、推动理论发展中起重大作用。笔者由此主张超越反基础主义,在吸收传统基础主义与反基础主义合理成分的基础上,提出一种综合性价值框架。
Cosmopolitanism and human value and communitarianism were facing furious criticism from post-modernism in the last decade of the 20th century which resulted in the rise of anti-foundationalism.Although anti-foundationalism has some positive function,it is hard to play a great role in explaining the world and boosting the development of IR theories because its goal is de-construction,rather than construction.We should go beyond anti-foundationalism and advance a comprehensive value framework on the base of the available components of foundationalism and anti-foundationalism.
出处
《国际论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期20-24,共5页
International Forum
