摘要
为比较可吸收材料和金属材料在踝部骨折治疗中的优缺点,了解可吸收材料的安全性及注意事项,选择2000-02/2004-05大连市第五人民医院收治的踝部骨折患者45例,分别应用可吸收螺钉(21例)与金属材料内固定(24例)治疗,并随访10～18个月。结果发现所有患者骨折均愈合,根据术后X射线片和关节功能恢复情况评定疗效,可吸收材料组优良率为92%(19/21),金属材料组优良率也为92%(22/24),两者之间比较差异不显著。这表明可吸收材料可以替代金属材料成为治疗踝部骨折的理想选择。
To compare the merit and shortcoming of treatment and securities with absorbable implants and metallic fixation for fractures of the ankle, 45 patients with ankle fractures were enrolled from the the Fifth Hospital of Dalian between February 2000 and May 2004 and treated with absorbable implants （n =21） and metallic fixation （n =24）, respectively. All patients were available for an average duration of follow-up of 10-18 months. The results were evaluated by radiographic representations and joint function and showed that all the patients were healed in ankle fractures. The total rate of good and excellent results was 92% （19/21） in absorbable implants group and 92% （22/24） in metallic group. There were no statistic differences between these two methods. Absorbable implants is believed to be a good method for the treatment of ankle fracture instead of metallic implants.
出处
《中国组织工程研究与临床康复》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第9期1766-1767,共2页
Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research
