摘要
法兰克福学派从科学的社会功能上论证,认为现代科技已政治化为一种意识形态;SSK的科学政治学派则将政治权力转换为“学科规训”概念,而从内在构成要素上对科学与政治的关系加以论证,结论是:任何现代学科都通过规训形式使“权力”渗透到其研究活动中,“权力”是科学知识的起源和内在因素,权力本身成了知识的标志。然而,科学事实上并非彻头彻尾的“权力”。科学中的政治因素不可完全排除,但这并不导致两者关系中地位的等同甚至颠覆。科学知识或说科学本质仍以客观性为主,政治因素等主观性则处于被支配的地位。
From the perspective of social function,Frankfurt school argues that modern science and technology have been politicalized into a sort of ideology;whereas the SSK's school of scientific politics has concerted political power into the concept of 'discipline'.The latter,by way of dealing with the relationship between science and politics based on the inherent components,has reached the conclusion that any modern science,with no exception,with infiltrate 'power' into its research operations through the form of discipline,and that 'power' is the source and internal factors of scientific knowledge whereby power itself has become a mark of knowledge.However,as a matter of fact,science is not a 'power' in its thorough sense.Although science cannot remove all the political factors,that does not mean an equal or even a reverse status will result in the relationship between the two sides.Scientific knowledge or essence will none the less keep objectivity as its mainspring while such subjectivity as political factors will remain in a subordinate place.
出处
《科学技术与辩证法》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第6期45-49,共5页
Science Technology and Dialectics
