摘要
我国《刑事诉讼法》将被害人确立为公诉案件当事人,被害人与人民检察院作为“共同原告”履行控诉职能,这在理论和实践中都暴露出许多问题。德国附带诉讼制度允许被害人作为附带诉讼的原告人而非公诉案件本身的当事人参加公诉,具有合理性。我国应借鉴德国的做法,增设刑事第三人制度,让被害人作为刑事第三人参加诉讼,并赋予其相应的诉讼权利,从而有效解决被害人在公诉案件中的参诉问题。
The criminal procedural law of our country establishes the injured to be for the case involved party, the injured and people＇ s procuratorate of public prosecution＂ mutual plaintiff＂ to fulfil complaint function, this exposes a lot of problems in theory and practice. The plaintiff person that German additional lawsuit system allows the injured to be additional lawsuit attends public prosecution instead of the involved party of case of public prosecution , has reasonability. Refer to the practice of Germany, our country should add 3th criminal person system, let the injured attend lawsuit as 3th criminal person , and give its corresponding lawsuit right, so efficiently solve the injured in the case of public prosecution ginseng tells problem.
出处
《政法论丛》
2006年第5期80-86,共7页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
国家社会科学基金项目--"刑事被害人人权保障机制研究"的研究成果之一。批准号:06XFX015
关键词
公诉案件
被害人
当事人
德国附带诉讼
刑事第三人
public prosecutional case
victims
criminal person
additional lawsuit in Germany
the 3th criminal person
