1See Douglas Walton, Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law, New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 6-9, pp. 54-63. 被引量：1
2Ronald P. Loui, A Citation--Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument, Argumentation, Vol. 16 (2002) ,No. 3. p. 260. 被引量：1
3See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2003(Updated ed. ), pp. 12-13, p. 15. 被引量：1
4See Stephen Toulmin, Richard Rieke and Allan Janik, An Introduction to Reasoning, New York . Macmillan, 1979, p. 78, p.78, pp. 203-309. 被引量：1
5See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999(Reprinted), p. 7, p. 42, p.43, p. 255, pp. 94-141. 被引量：1
6See David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij, The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work Using Stephen Edelston Toulmin's Layout of Arguments, Argumentation, Vol. 19(2005),No. 3, p. 255. 被引量：1
7See R. Schmidt, Influence of the Legal Paradigm, in Peter Murphy ed. , Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources, New York:Oxford University Press Inc, 2003, pp. 103-105, pp. 293-298, p. 289. 被引量：1
8See David Hitchcock, The practice of argumentative discussion, Argumentation,Vol. 16 (2002), No. 3. p. 291, pp. 78-80, p.162. 被引量：1
9See Ralph H. Johnson, Manifest Rationalty, A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,2000, p. 45. 被引量：1
10See Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic :Conversational Contexts of Argument, Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 1998. 被引量：1
