摘要
本文以最高法院示范性案例中的全部“死罪”案例为样本进行法律解释学的实证研究,发现了犯罪中是否构成死罪、死罪中是否适用死刑、死刑中是否立即执行的一些重要不同。根据这些发现,文章认为法律解释既是规范判断又是自主判断,应尽可能提高法律本身的明确性,以呼唤死刑适用更大程度上向规范层面的回归。
In his empirical study, from the perspective of legal hermeneutics, of the body of Supreme Court demonstration cases involving capital offenses, the author finds some important differences in whether a crime constitutes a capital offense, whether the death penalty is applied in such offenses, and whether the death penalty is administered immediately. Based on his findings, the author holds that legal interpretations are at the same time normative and autonomous judgments. The law should be made as clear as possible so that the application of the death penalty can revert to the norm.
出处
《中国社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期135-145,共11页
Social Sciences in China
基金
国家社科基金资助项目"刑事司法公正性实证研究"的阶段性成果之一
