摘要
从冲突法的理论和实践来看,法律冲突的解决可归纳为以“私人”、“政府”和“社会”为本位三种情形。无疑,仅从法律逻辑上将无法对冲突法之本位的取舍做出完整的评估,就此,需要广泛地运用其他学科的理论。其中,依国际关系理论对这三种本位制进行分析,得出的结论是,“私人本位制”应成为各国冲突法立法的普遍选择;然而,以“私人”为本位的冲突法体系也应在有限的范围内或有限的程度上,以各种途径和方式有机地整合“政府本位制”和“社会本位制”的因素。同时,这也是健全和完善我国冲突法立法的一个重要方面。
As to the theories and practice, the conflict of laws can be solved on the there basis： ＂private＂, ＂government＂ and ＂society＂. In line with the legal thinking, it will fail to distinguish which basis is leading one in conflict of laws, so we must resort to other disciplines. Among them, the answer given by the international relations theory is that the ＂private - basis＂ ought to become the primary choice by conflict of laws. Certainly, at the same times, conflict of laws should take into account some elements of the ＂government - basis＂ and ＂society- basis＂ in various means. This is also the way to perfect the China＇s conflict of laws.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期51-61,共11页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
法律冲突
本位
国际关系理论
The Conflict of Laws
Basis
International Relations Theory
