摘要
信托受益权性质一直存在争议,归纳起来有债权说、复合权利说、新权利说等不同观点。上述学说虽然有一定的合理性,但都存在可商榷之处。从实然层面和应然层面分析,信托受益权应定位于物权。信托受益权标的物的不特定性与受益人给付请求权存在的事实不能作为否认信托受益权为物权的当然理由,而且作为一种特殊物权,信托受益权并不违反物权法定原则和一物一权主义。
There have always been different opinions concerning the legal character of beneficial right. To sum up, there have been personal-right theory, mixed-right theory and new-right theory. Although these theories are reasonable in their own ways, each of them has points that call for debate. Judging from the actual and deserving Viewpoints, beneficial right should be regarded as real right. The fact that the object of beneficial right is non-specific and there exists claim-right for beneficiary cannot serve as a sure reason of denying beneficial right as real right. Moreover, as a kind of special real right, beneficial right doesn＇t violate real-right legalization principle and one-object-one-right theory.
出处
《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第5期64-68,共5页
Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
信托受益权
债权
物权
特殊物权
beneficial right
personal right
real right
special real right
