摘要
行政变更判决可以有效保护当事人的合法权益,也是诉讼经济原则的要求,司法变更权本质上就是一种司法权。美国、英国、德国、台湾地区、法国和荷兰的立法与实践为完善我国的变更判决提供了经验。我国《行政诉讼法》第54条规定的变更判决具有适用范围特殊性、适用条件单一性、适用方式选择性的特点。法院对“显失公正”的行政处罚不应判决变更,而应撤销或确认违法。完善我国的变更判决应重新界定其适用范围,并充分发挥撤销重作判决的作用。
The judgement of alteration can availably protect the party＇s legal rights and interests. It is the request of the principle of litigation economy. The right of judicial alteration is a kind of judicial right in nature. The correlative legislation and practice of the U. S. , the U. K. , Germany, the area of TaiWan, France and Holand provide us experience to perfect the judgement of alteration. This judgement in the fifty-forth item of Chinese Administrative Litigation Law has three characters： particularity for confine, oneness for condition, and selectivity for manner. The judge shouldn＇t alter but repeal or affirm it illegal to the distinctly unfair administrative punishment. It should be taken measures from the follow sides to perfect the Chinese judgement of alteration： newly defining the scope of it, fully exercising the judgement of repeal and doing over.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2006年第5期151-158,共8页
Contemporary Law Review
关键词
变更判决
司法变更权
显失公正
撤销重作判决
judgement of alteration right of judicial alteration
obviously unfair
judgement of repeal and doing over
