期刊文献+

EXPRESSION AND SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF DNA-PK IN NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA CELL LINES CNE1 AND CNE2 WITH DIFFERENT RADIOSENSITIVITY 被引量:3

EXPRESSION AND SUBCELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF DNA-PK IN NASOPHARYNGEAL CARCINOMA CELL LINES CNE1 AND CNE2 WITH DIFFERENT RADIOSENSITIVITY
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: Radiosensitivity is mainly determined by the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation and the extent of its repair. The DNA-PK complex formation is one of the major pathways by which the mammalian cells respond to DSBs repairing. Our previous study suggested that CNE1 is more radioresistant than CNE2. This study was designed to answer whether the radiosensitive difference of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma cell lines CNE1/CNE2 was related to the expression and localization of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the subcellular localization of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs in NPC cells lines CNE1 and CNE2. Western-blot was used to determine the expression of Ku protein in total extract of CNE1 and CNE2 and semi-quantitative assay of protein expression was performed to estimate the optic density (OD) value of each band using automatic image analysis system. Results: Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs primarily located in the nuclei. A part of nucleolus in CNE1 and CNE2 showed positive dyeing of DNA-PKcs. Protein expression of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs was detected in CNE1 and CNE2, and the integral optical density (IOD) of Ku70 protein was 22.03 ± 7.56 and 19.98 ± 6.04 respectively (t=0.021, P〉0.05), while the IODs of Ku80 protein in the two cell lines were 33.44 ± 12.87 and 28.98 ± 9.24 respectively (t=0.24, P〉0.05), and the IODs of DNA-PKcs protein were 45.03 ± 1.77 and 40.87 ± 4.19 (t=1.58, P〉0.05). The above results suggested that the basic expression of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs had no statistic difference between the different radiosensitive NPC cell lines CNE1 and CNE2. Conclusion: The variation of radiosensitivity in NPC cell lines CNE1 and CNE2 has no obviously correlation with the subcellular localization and basic expression of DNA-PK protein. So we presumed that the difference of radiosensitivity between CNE1 and CNE2 may be on account of some other factors than subcellular localization and basic expression of DNA-PK. Objective: Radiosensitivity is mainly determined by the number of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induced by ionizing radiation and the extent of its repair. The DNA-PK complex formation is one of the major pathways by which the mammalian cells respond to DSBs repairing. Our previous study suggested that CNE1 is more radioresistant than CNE2. This study was designed to answer whether the radiosensitive difference of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma cell lines CNE1/CNE2 was related to the expression and localization of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs. Methods: Immunohistochemistry was performed to detect the subcellular localization of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs in NPC cells lines CNE1 and CNE2. Western-blot was used to determine the expression of Ku protein in total extract of CNE1 and CNE2 and semi-quantitative assay of protein expression was performed to estimate the optic density (OD) value of each band using automatic image analysis system. Results: Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs primarily located in the nuclei. A part of nucleolus in CNE1 and CNE2 showed positive dyeing of DNA-PKcs. Protein expression of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs was detected in CNE1 and CNE2, and the integral optical density (IOD) of Ku70 protein was 22.03 ± 7.56 and 19.98 ± 6.04 respectively (t=0.021, P〉0.05), while the IODs of Ku80 protein in the two cell lines were 33.44 ± 12.87 and 28.98 ± 9.24 respectively (t=0.24, P〉0.05), and the IODs of DNA-PKcs protein were 45.03 ± 1.77 and 40.87 ± 4.19 (t=1.58, P〉0.05). The above results suggested that the basic expression of Ku70/Ku80/DNA-PKcs had no statistic difference between the different radiosensitive NPC cell lines CNE1 and CNE2. Conclusion: The variation of radiosensitivity in NPC cell lines CNE1 and CNE2 has no obviously correlation with the subcellular localization and basic expression of DNA-PK protein. So we presumed that the difference of radiosensitivity between CNE1 and CNE2 may be on account of some other factors than subcellular localization and basic expression of DNA-PK.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Cancer Research》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2006年第2期77-82,共6页 中国癌症研究(英文版)
基金 This work was supported by a grant fromthe National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.30070237).
关键词 Nasopharyngeal carcinoma RADIOSENSITIVITY DNA-PK Nasopharyngeal carcinoma Radiosensitivity DNA-PK
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1梁明达 胡美英 等.云南个旧肺腺癌细胞系GLC-82的建立及特性分析[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1985,7(2):81-83. 被引量:5
  • 2王秦秦 郝萍 等.抗人肺癌单克隆抗体研制及免疫组化分析543例[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1992,14(6):473-473. 被引量:6
  • 3陈诗书 汤雪明 等.医学细胞与分子生物学[M].上海:上海医科大学出版社,1996.198,316. 被引量:5
  • 4Hahn S A, Seymour A B, Howue ATM, et al. Allelotype of pancreatic adenocarcinoma using xenograft enrichment[J]. Cancer Res, 1995, 55 :4670-4675. 被引量:1
  • 5Stamblic V, Macpherson D, Sas D, et al. Regulation of PTEN transcription by p53 [J]. Mol Cell, 2001, 8 : 317-325. 被引量:1
  • 6Chakravarti A, Delaney M A, Noll E, et al. Prognostic and pathologic significance of quantitative protein expression profiling in human gliomas[J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7: 2387-2395. 被引量:1
  • 7Fujii G H, Morimoto A M, Berson A E, et al. Transcriptional analysis of the PTEN/MMA1C pseudogene psi PTEN[J]. Oncogene, 1999, 18,1765-1769. 被引量:1
  • 8Gimm O, Perren A, Weng L P, et al. Differential nuclear and cytoplasmic expression of PTEN in normal thyroid tissue, and benign and malignant epithelial thyroid tumors[J]. Am J Pathol. 2000, 156, 1693-1700. 被引量:1
  • 9Cao Y,J Immunol Method,1998年,220卷,1/2期,85页 被引量:1
  • 10陈诗书,医学细胞与分子生物医学,1996年,198,316页 被引量:1

共引文献58

同被引文献18

  • 1许良中,杨文涛.免疫组织化学反应结果的判断标准[J].中国癌症杂志,1996,6(4):229-231. 被引量:1365
  • 2贺玉香,夏云飞,刘秀芳,蒋昌斌.不同敏感性鼻咽癌细胞株中Ku蛋白表达情况比较[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(2):116-119. 被引量:13
  • 3刘秀芳,夏云飞,李满枝,贺玉香,郑美莲,蒋昌斌.不同p53功能状态鼻咽癌细胞株的放射生物学特性[J].中华放射肿瘤学杂志,2005,14(4):335-338. 被引量:8
  • 4[1]Van Gent DC,Hoeijmakers JH,Kanaar R.Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-sranded break connection[J].Nat Rev Genet,2001,2(3):196-206. 被引量:1
  • 5[2]Rdgas B,Borgo S,Elhosseiny A,et al.Decreased expression of DNA-depondent protein kinase,a DNA repair protein,during human colon carcinogenesis[J].Cancer Res,2001,61(23):8381-8384. 被引量:1
  • 6[3]Pucci S,Mazzarelli P,Rabitti C,et al.Tumor specific modulation of Ku70/Ku80 DNA binding activity in breast and bladder human tumor biopsies[J].Oncogene,2001,20(6):739-747. 被引量:1
  • 7[5]Lowe SW,Schimitt EM,Smith SW,et al.P53 is required for radiation-induced apoptosis in mouse thymocytes[J].Nature,1993,362(6423):847-849. 被引量:1
  • 8[6]Ribeiro JC,barnetson A R,Fisher RJ,et al.Relationship between radiation response and p53 status in human bladder cancer cells[J].Int J Radiat Biol,1997,72(1):11-20. 被引量:1
  • 9[7]Waldman T,Lengauer C,Kinzler KW,et al.Uncoupling of S phase and mitosis induced by anticancer agents in cells lacking p21[J].Nature,1996,381(6584):713-716. 被引量:1
  • 10[8]Wouters BG,Giaccia AJ,Denko NC,et al.Loss of p21 Wafl/Cipl sensitizes tumors to radiation by an apoptosis-independent machanism[J].Cancer Res,1997,57(21):4703-4706. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部