期刊文献+

低位直肠癌保肛手术两种吻合方法的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Two Anastomotic Procedures in Anus-preserving Radical Operations of Low Rectal Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 评价低位直肠癌保肛手术两种吻合方法的安全性和实用性。选择329例低位直肠癌实施保肛手术,经肛门环扎式吻合法137例,吻合器加肛门支撑管法192例。两组病例无手术死亡。术后并发症:吻合口漏:经肛门环扎组2例(1.5%,2/137),吻合器组2例(1.0%,2/192);吻合口出血:环扎组4例(2.9%,4/137),吻合器组3例(1.6%,3/192);吻合口狭窄:环扎组7例(5.1%,7/137),吻合器组8例(4.1%,8/192)。结果表明,吻合器吻合法适用于肛提肌以上平面的吻合,经肛门环扎式吻合适用于肛提肌上下任何平面的吻合,两种方法都是安全可靠成熟的术式,而后者更具有实用性和创新性。 The objective of the study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of two anastomotic procedures in anus-preserving radical operations of low rectal carcinoma. Of the 329 cases who underwent anus-preser ving radical operations,137 received transanal circular-ligated anastomosis (procedure Ⅰ ) and 192 anussupporting stapling anastomosis(procedure Ⅱ ). There was no case death during operations. Anastomotic leakage was found in 2 cases of procedure Ⅰ (1.5%) and in another 2 cases of procedure Ⅱ (1.0%);anastomotic bleeding was noticed in 4 cases of procedureⅠ (2.9%) and in 3 cases of procedure Ⅱ (1.6%);and anastomotic stricture occurred in 7 cases of procedure Ⅰ (5.%) and in 8 cases of procedure Ⅱ (4.1%). It is concluded that procedure Ⅱ is more adaptable anastomosis above the level of levator ani muscle, while procedure I is feasible at any levels,more applicable and bring forth new ideas;and procedure Ⅰ , Ⅱare both reliable and safe surgical procedures.
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2006年第6期14-15,共2页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 直肠癌 保肛手术 吻合术 外科 Recal carcinoma Anus-preserving operation Anastomosis,surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1吴凌云,李衍杭,■玉娟,于居功,■方海,孙国富,王训颖.保肛性环扎式结肠肛管吻合术用于低位直肠癌治疗(附300例报告)[J].结直肠肛门外科,1995,0(1):45-47. 被引量:1
  • 2李相阳,张彤,孙永信,吴凌云,韩方海.吻合器加支撑引流管在低位直肠癌保肛手术中的应用[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2004,7(5):414-414. 被引量:4
  • 3郁宝铭,李东华,郑民华,王灏.双吻合器低位前切除术治疗低位直肠癌[J].现代手术学杂志,1997,2(2):79-81. 被引量:29
  • 4Ruo L,Guillem JG.Major 20th-century advances in the management of rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42(5):563-578. 被引量:1
  • 5Lavery IC,Lopez-Kostner F,Fazio VW,et al.Chances of cure are not compromised with sphincter-saving procedures for cancer of the lower third of the rectum.Surgery,1997,122(4):779-784. 被引量:1
  • 6Berger A,Tiret E,Cunningham C,et al.Rectal excision and colonic pouch-anal anastomosis for rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42(10):1265-1271. 被引量:1
  • 7Gamagami RA,Liagre A,Chiotasso P,et al.Coloanal anastomosis for distal third rectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42(10):1272-1275. 被引量:1
  • 8Saito N,Ono M,Sugito M,et al.Early results of intersphincteric resection for patients with very low rectal cancer:an active approach to avoid a perminant colostomy.Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(4):459-466. 被引量:1
  • 9Hida J,Yoshifuji T,Tokoro T,et al.Comparison of long-term functional results of colonic J-pouch and straight anastomosis after low anterior resection for rectal cancer:a five-year follow-up.Dis Colon Rectum,2004,47(10):1578-1585. 被引量:1
  • 10Lazorthes F,Gamagami R,Chiotasso P,et al.Prospective,randomized study comparing clinical results between small and large colonic J-pouch following coloanal anastomosis.Dis Colon Rectum,1997,40(12):1409-1413. 被引量:1

共引文献230

同被引文献17

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部