期刊文献+

高校排名 被引量:4

Ranking of Higher Education Institutions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 介绍全球各主要媒体和学术机构的排行榜,收集归纳各方面对排行榜的反应和评论,分析排行榜对各方面的作用和影响。着重剖析各排行榜所存在的问题,以及由于排行榜引发的各校之间的不健康竞争等。并列举各种原因,说明为什么各个质量保证机构一般都不做排行榜。同时,也指出公众对质量保证机构及其工作非常陌生,质量论证对公众的作用极小。而排行榜却以通俗的形式容易为公众所接受。如果大学的质量靠排行榜设置的标准来评判其好坏,并力求符合这些标准的话,那么,这样发展下去,我们究竟是离开优质教育更近了,还是更远了呢? In this paper the authors introduce the rankings of the major media and academic groups, collect the responses and comments, and analyze the effect of the rankings. They mainly discuss the problems of the rankings and the unhealthy competition among HEIs triggered from the rankings. The reasons are presented to illustrate why quality assurance institutions do not do rankings. Meanwhile, the authors point out that the public is not familiar with the quality assurance institutions and their work, and that the quality accreditation has little effect on the public. However, because of their popular form, the rankings can be easily accepted by the public. If the quality of HEIs is decided by the criteria and standards set by the rankings, which should be met, then excellent education is close to or far away from us?
出处 《高教发展与评估》 2006年第3期23-32,共10页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 高校 排行榜 质量保证机构 大学竞争 优质教育 教学质量 排名程序 规范化 世界 higher education institutions (HEIs) rankings quality assurance institutions competition among HEIs
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Brown R.League tables:Do we have to live with them? Article for 'Perspectives',2006 forthcoming. 被引量:1
  • 2Clarke M.Weighing Things Up:A Closer Look at the U.S.News and World Report's Ranking Formulas[J].College and University Journal 79.3 Winter 2004:3~9. 被引量:1
  • 3Clarke M.Quality assessment lessons from Australia and New Zealand[J].HE in Europe 30,2 July 2005. 被引量:1
  • 4Cohen D.Magazines Rankings of Asian Univer-sities are Popular with Readers,Not Academics[J].The Chronicle of Higher Education 14 May 1999:A51. 被引量:1
  • 5Crissey M.Changes in Annual College Guides Fail to Quell Criticisms on Their Validity[J].The Chronicle of Higher Education 5 September 1997:A67. 被引量:1
  • 6Davis D.The Real World of Performance Indicators:A review of their use in selected commonwealth countries[Z].London:Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service,1996. 被引量:1
  • 7Dill D,Soo M.Is there a global definition of academic quality? A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems[J].Public Policy for Academic Quality University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,January 2004. 被引量:1
  • 8Garter D S.A review of measures used in US News & World Report's America's Best Colleges[Z].USA:The Lombardi Program on Measuring University Performance,2002. 被引量:1
  • 9Graham H D,Diamond N.Academic Departments and the Ratings Game[J].The Chronicle of Higher Education 18 June 1999. 被引量:1
  • 10Guarino C,et al.Latent variable analysis:A new approach to university ranking[J].HE in Europe 30,2 July 2005. 被引量:1

同被引文献18

引证文献4

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部