期刊文献+

阅读理解困难儿童的理解监控特点 被引量:9

Comprehension Monitoring Features of The Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties
原文传递
导出
摘要 使用错误觉察任务,设计无意义词、经验错误和逻辑错误三种破坏文章意义的错误信息,考察阅读理解困难儿童的理解监控特点。结果发现:(1)阅读理解困难儿童只是对破坏整体意义的逻辑错误觉察水平落后,对破坏命题意义的经验错误觉察水平与正常儿童相当,对破坏解码流畅性的无意义词觉察水平反而比正常儿童高。(2)阅读理解困难儿童对无意义词的觉察水平最高,其次是经验错误和逻辑错误;正常儿童对经验错误的觉察水平最高,其次是逻辑错误和无意义词。 Error detection tests and three kinds of error messages (non - sense words, experimental errors and logical errors) which ruin the meaning of the passages are designed to study the comprehension monitoring features of the children with reading comprehension difficulties. The results show that: ( 1 ) children with reading comprehension difficulties only fall behind in the detection level of logical errors which damage the whole meaning of articles, but the performance in the detection level of experimental errors which damage the preposition meaning is similar as that of normal children. While children with reading comprehension difficulties have higher detection level of non- sense words which damage the decoding fluency than normal ones. (2) children with reading comprehension difficulties have the highest detection level of non - sense words, and the following are experimental errors and logical errors; but as to normal ones, they have the highest detection level of experimental errors, and the following are logical errors and non - sense words.
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第4期53-57,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 教育部人文社会科学"十五"规划资助项目(项目号:01JBXLXOO4) 全国教育科学规划项目(项目号:DBB030239)
关键词 阅读理解困难 理解监控 错误觉察 reading comprehension difficulties comprehension monitoring error detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Stothard S E, Hulme C. A comparison of phonological skills in children with reading comprehension difficulties and children with decoding difficulties. J.Child Psychiat, 1995, 36 : 399 - 408 被引量:1
  • 2Kate N, Margaret J S. Semantic processing and the development of word - recognition skills: evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties.Journal of Memory and Language, 1998, 39: 85-101 被引量:1
  • 3Palincsar A M, Brown A L. Reciprocal teaching of comprehension- forstering and comprenhension -monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction,1984: 117- 175 被引量:1
  • 4Yuill N, Oakhill J V. Childrens problems in text comprehension. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1991:471 - 490 被引量:1
  • 5Comoldi C, Oakhill J. Reading comprehension difficulties: processes and intervention. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996. 被引量:1
  • 6迟毓凯.金西文章阅读表征理论述评[J].广东工业大学学报(社会科学版),2002,2(4):79-82. 被引量:5
  • 7王孝玲,陶宝平.小学生识字量评价量表.上海:上海教育出版社,1993. 被引量:6
  • 8莫雷著..语文阅读水平测量 1[M].广州:中山大学出版社,1987:234.
  • 9莫雷.不同年级学生自然阅读过程信息加工活动特点研究[J].心理学报,1998,30(1):43-49. 被引量:15
  • 10Cain K, Oakhill J V. Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure. Reading and Writing, 1999, 11 : 489 - 503 被引量:1

二级参考文献12

  • 1崔耀.阅读理解中的长时工作记忆[J].心理科学进展,1997,7(1):2-6. 被引量:16
  • 2崔耀.篇章理解中的表征理论[J].心理科学进展,1993,3(3):14-19. 被引量:3
  • 3[1]Britton, B.K., Gulgoz, S. Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effect of reepairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structuers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1991. 83: 329-345 被引量:1
  • 4[3]Kintsch, W., van Dijk, T. A. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 1978, 85:363 -394 被引量:1
  • 5[4]van Dijk, T.A., Kintsch, W. Strategies in discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press. 1983 被引量:1
  • 6[5]Kintsch, W. The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction- integration model. Psychological Review, 1988,95: 163- 182 被引量:1
  • 7[6]Kintsch, W. Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998 被引量:1
  • 8[7]Kintsch, W. Learning from text. American Psychologist, 1994,49:294 - 303 被引量:1
  • 9[8]Ericsson, K.A., Kintsch, W. Long-term working memory.Psychology Review, 1995, 102: 211- 245 被引量:1
  • 10莫雷,心理科学通讯,1990年,1期,17页 被引量:1

共引文献22

同被引文献134

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部