期刊文献+

输尿管镜钬激光碎石与后腹腔镜手术治疗复杂输尿管上段结石的疗效比较 被引量:6

Comparative Study of therapeutic effects for complex proximal ureter stones with endoscopic laser lithotripsy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估两种微创手术治疗复杂输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法回顾性分析输尿管镜下钬激光碎石取石术、后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石术治疗复杂输尿管上段结石患者的资料。结果输尿管镜钬激光碎石25例,后腹腔镜取石15例。输尿管镜钬激光碎石组25例,其中一次性成功17例,其余经二期手术后成功排出,平均手术时间65min。后腹腔镜组15例均取石成功,无漏尿发生,平均手术时间75min。结论后腹腔镜取石为复杂输尿管上段结石的治疗提供了新的选择,复杂输尿管上段结石可选择腹腔镜手术治疗。 Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of endoscopic laser lithotripsy and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for complex proximal ureter stones (PUS). Methods The clinical data of 40 patients with PUS treated with endoscopic laser lithotripsy group 1 (n=25) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy group 2 ( n = 15 ) were retrospectively analyzed. Results In group 1, Holmium laser lithotripsy was successfully completed on one session in 17 cases, with the success rate being 68% (17/25), the other 8 case were succeed on the second alternative treatment. The mean operative time was 65 min; All the 15 cases in group 2 underwent retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy successfully. No leakage of urine was observed. The mean operative time was 75 min. Conclusion Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a new choice to the treatment of complex proximal ureter stones.
出处 《中国现代医药杂志》 2006年第4期31-33,共3页 Modern Medicine Journal of China
关键词 钬激光 后腹腔镜技术 输尿管上端结石 Holmium laser Retroperitoneal laparoseopy proximal ureter stones (PUS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献9

  • 1陆曙炎,陈建国,张焕兴,周忠兴,邹建钢,吴小鹏,陈仰之,陈静,刘伟民,高谷深.后腹腔镜手术治疗泌尿系疾病(附23例报告)[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,1997,18(2):110-112. 被引量:113
  • 2Daniel J, Painter, Francis X, et al. New concepts in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Current Opinion in Urology,2001, 11: 373-378. 被引量:1
  • 3Park H, Park M, Park T. Two year experience with ureteral stones: extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy vs ureteroscopic manipulation. J Endourol, 1998, 12:501-504. 被引量:1
  • 4Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree G K, et al. Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol, 1996,49: 86-91. 被引量:1
  • 5Jackman S V,Docimo S G, Cadeddu J A, et al. The mini-pere' technique: a less invasive alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol, 1998,16 : 371-374. 被引量:1
  • 6Lahme S,Bichler K H,Strohmaire W H, et al. Minimally invasive PCNL in patients with renal pelvic and calyceal stones. Eur Urol, 2001, 40:619-624. 被引量:1
  • 7Maheshwar P N, Oswal A T, Andankar M, et al. Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol, 1999, 13: 441-444. 被引量:1
  • 8Devarajan R, Ashraf M, Beck R O, et al. Holmium:YAG lasertripsy for ureteric calculi: an experience of 300 procedures. Br J Urol,1998,82:342-347. 被引量:1
  • 9陆曙炎,陈建国,张焕兴,邹建纲,周忠兴,吴小鹏,刘伟民.后腹腔镜肾盂输尿管切开取石术技术改进的探讨[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,2004,19(3):132-133. 被引量:35

共引文献236

同被引文献28

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部