摘要
目的综合评价中国不同城市社区老年人生存质量(QOL),并对评价结果分档排序。方法采用主成分因子分析(PCA)法确定中文版SF-36各个领域的权重,并运用TOPSIS法与秩和比(RSR)法相结合进行综合评价。结果成都老年人QOL最优;相对较优的依次为上海、广州;长沙、天津、沈阳和苏州老年人QOL归为中档。结论PCA能较好地确定SF-36各个领域的权重;TOPSIS法与RSR法相结合能全面、合理地评价社区老年人QOL;除城市经济状况外,老年人的生活方式及心理状态等其他因素对QOL有一定程度的影响。
Objective To synthetically evaluate the quality of life（QOL） of city-dwelling eiders in different cities of China to file and sequence the evaluation resutls. Methods The weights of the 8 dimensions of SF-36 were calculated by primary component analysis （PCA） to comprehensively evaluate by TOPSIS and rank sum ratio（RSR） method. Results The elders＇ QOL in Chengdu is the best,secondly Shanghai, Guangzhou in the good grade, next Changsha, Tianjin, Shenyang and Suzhou in the moderate grade. Conclusions PCA could confirm well the weights of SF-36. TOPSIS and RSR method could comprehensively assess the QOL of elders. Except for economy condition of city,life style, mental state and other factors are important related factors to QOL
出处
《中国老年学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2006年第4期440-442,共3页
Chinese Journal of Gerontology
基金
国家自然科学基金资助项目(30371234)
关键词
TOPSIS法
秩和比法
综合评价
生存质量
城市老年人
TOPSIS method
Rank sum ratio method
Comprehensive evaluation
Quality of life
City-dwelling elder
