期刊文献+

布比卡因腰麻行剖宫产术的剂量探讨 被引量:4

The best Dose of Bupivacaine in Lumbar Anesthesia for Cesarean Section
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探索布比卡因腰麻用于剖宫产手术的最佳剂量。方法选择80例剖宫产手术,分别用0.75%布比卡因2. 0mL(A组20例)、1.5mL(B组20例)、1.2mL(C组20例)、1.0mL(D组20例)进行腰麻,观察麻醉显效时间、镇痛质量、麻醉平面、维持时间、运动阻滞程度、麻醉后低血压、恶心呕吐情况、产妇术后头痛发生率及新生儿Apgar评分。结果四组麻醉显效时间差异无显著性(P>0.05);镇痛质量D组与A组比较差异有显著性(P<0.05);麻醉平面维持时间D组与A组及 B组比较差异显著(P<0.01或P<0.05);运动阻滞程度C、D两组与A组比较明显较轻(P<0.05或P<0.01),D组有阻滞不全、肌松不良表现;麻醉后低血压、恶心呕吐副作用发生率C、D组明显低(P<0.05或P<0.01)。结论 0.75%布比卡因腰麻剖宫产手术的最佳剂最为1.2mL。 AIM To observe the best dose of Bupivacaine in lumbar anesthesia for cesarean section. Methods The 80 full-term puerperas of cesarean section with lumbar anesthesia were randomly divided into four groups: group A(20 cases,0.75% Bupivacaine 2.0 mL),group B (20 cases,0.75% Bupivacaine 1.5 mL),group C (20 cases, 0.75% Bupivacaine 1.2 mL) and group D (20 cases,0.75% Bupivacaine 1.0 mL).Anesthesia induction time,pain control,anesthesia level holding time,motor nerve depression,MAP and SPO: level,the rate of headache of the pueroeras in postoperation and newborn Apgar score were compared among the four groups.Rsults There was no significant difference in the time of anesthesia inductin,the rate of headache of the pueroeras in postoperation and newborn Apgar score among the four groups.The pain control in group A was significantly better than itin group D(P〈0.05). Anesthesia level holding time was significantly longer in group A and in group B as compared with it in group D(P 〈0.01 or P〈0.05).Motor nerve depression was significantly lighter in group C and in group D as compared with it in group A (P〈0.05 or P〈0.01). The incidences of side-effects were lower in group C and in group D as compared with those in group A (P〈0.05 or P〈0.01).Conclusion The best dose of 0.75% Bupivacaine in lumbar anesthesia for cesarean section is 1.2mL.
出处 《中国血液流变学杂志》 CAS 2006年第1期114-116,共3页 Chinese Journal of Hemorheology
关键词 剖宫产 布比卡因 腰麻 cesarean section Buoivacaine lumbar anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献14

  • 1赵宏,卢丽萍,崔健君.硬膜外阻滞剖宫产术中静脉输入乳酸钠林格氏液对母婴的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,1995,15(8):350-352. 被引量:14
  • 2赵新王 李树人 屈劲风 等.腰麻与硬膜外麻醉对削官产母要安全及应激反应的影响.中华麻醉学杂志,1995,18(2):73-75. 被引量:1
  • 3Clement AJ. Anaesthesia and cardiac disease[M]. In: Churchill-- Davidson HC,ed. A practice of anaesthesia. 4th edn. London: Lloyd -- Luke LTD, 1979 : 533--537. 被引量:1
  • 4张国楼,国外医学.麻醉学与复苏分册,1995年,16卷,202页 被引量:1
  • 5刘俊杰 赵俊.现代麻醉学:第2版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1998.783~784. 被引量:37
  • 62,Hankeln K,Beez M. Haemodynamic and oxygen transport correlates of various volumesubstitutes in critically ill in-patients with various aetiologies of haemodynamicinstability. Inter J Inten Care,1998,5:8~12. 被引量:1
  • 73,Sharma SK,Gajraj NM,Sidawi JE. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia:acomparison of intravascular adminstration of hetastarch verus lactated ringer's solution.Anesth Analg,1997,84:111~114. 被引量:1
  • 8Rosemberg PH,Heinonen E,et al.Differential sensitivity of A and C fibers to long-acting amide local anaesthesia[].British Journal of Anaesthesia.1983 被引量:1
  • 9Carpenter RL.Future epidural or subarachnoid analgesics : local anesthetics[].Regional Anesthesia.1996 被引量:1
  • 10McClure JH.The obstetric challenge[].American Journal of Anesthesiology.1997 被引量:1

共引文献161

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部