期刊文献+

计时“起立-行走”测试在评价脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力中的价值 被引量:14

The Value of the Timed"up & go" Test at the Evaluation of ADL in Patients with Stroke
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究脑卒中患者计时“起立-行走”测试(TUGT)与ADL的关系,为临床提供一种简单易行的评价方法。方法:对46例治疗后恢复步行能力的脑卒中偏瘫患者进行TUGT测试,同时用Barther(BI)指数测定其ADL能力,并对各变量间进行相关统计分析,ROC曲线确定敏感性和特异性均较高的临界值。结果:TUGT与BI呈负相关(-0.534,P<0.005)。TUGT值判断脑卒中偏瘫患者ADL完全自立的ROC曲线下面积为0.827,P=0.0026,95%可信区间为0.654-1.05,判断步行自立的最佳TUGT临界值为14.9 s,其相应敏感性为88.4%,特异性为90.5%。结论:TUGT作为一个筛查和评价工具与BI结合可以更加充分地描述脑卒中患者功能性移动的能力,为临床评定提供客观依据。 Objective: To provide a simple and easy evaluating method for clinics by studying the relationship between the timed "up and go" test (TUGT) and activity of daily living (ADL). Methods: Forty-six hemiparetic stroke patients who had walking ability were enrolled in this study. The ability of ADL was measured by Barthel Index (BI), and variables of TUGT and BI were statistically analyzed respectively. The critical value of TUGT was determined by ROC curve. Results: There was a negative relationship between TUGT and BI (r=-0. 534, P〈0.002). The area of ROC in which stroke patients can stand on their own legs thoroughly was 0. 827 (P=0. 0026, 95 % Ci, 0. 654 1.05). The optimal cut-off values of TUGT to estimate the independent walking of patients were 14.9 s, and in stroke group sensitivity and specificity of TUGT were 88.4 % and 90.5 % re spectively. Conclusion.. TUGT, as a selective and evaluating instrument, combined with BI, may depict more thoroughly the mobility of stroke patients and to provide objective basis for clinical evaluation.
出处 《中国康复》 2006年第2期83-84,共2页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation
关键词 脑卒中 计时“起立-行走”测试 临界值 生活自理能力 strokes timed "up and go" test cut-off values independent living ability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献24

  • 1中华神经科学会 中华神经外科学会.各类脑血管病诊断要点[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,6:379-379. 被引量:830
  • 2王新德.各类脑血管疾病的诊断要点[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1988,21:60-60. 被引量:77
  • 3Shah S, Vanclay F, Cooper B. Stroke rehabilitation:Australian patient profile and functional outcome. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991,44 ( 1 ) : 21 -- 28. 被引量:1
  • 4Lin J H,Chang CM, Liu CK et al. Efficiency and effeetiveness of stroke rehabilitation after first stroke. J Formos Med Assoe, 2000, 99 (6) : 483 -- 490. 被引量:1
  • 5Inouye M, Kishi K, Ikeda Y et al. Prediction of functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2000 ,79(6) :513--518. 被引量:1
  • 6Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Reliability of the modified motor assessment scale and the Barthel index. Phys Ther, 1988,68(7) : 1077-- 1078. 被引量:1
  • 7Shah S, Vanelay F, Cooper B. Stroke rehabilitation:Australian patient profile and functional outcome. J Clin Epidemiol, 1991,44(1) :21--28. 被引量:1
  • 8Gosman-Hedstrom G,Svensson E. Parallel reliability of the functional independence measure and the Barthel ADL index. Disabil Rehabil, 2000,22 (16) : 702-- 715. 被引量:1
  • 9Lincoln NB,Jackson JM,Edmans JA et al. The accuracy of predictions about progress of patients on a stroke unit. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1990, 53 ( 11 ) :972--975. 被引量:1
  • 10Shelton FD, Volpe BP, Reding M. Motor impairment as a predictor of functional recovery and quide to rehabilitation treatment after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2001,15 : 229-- 237. 被引量:1

共引文献112

同被引文献142

引证文献14

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部