摘要
包容犯是法定的一罪和加重的犯罪构成中出现的一种新的罪数形态,在我国新刑法中存在多处包容犯立法例,其和结合犯、吸收犯、牵连犯等一罪的形态存在差异,对包容犯应依法按照包容罪名的加重构成论处。包容犯立法例存在一定事实和逻辑上的依据,体现了立法者对公正和效率的追求,但包容犯立法例也存在不少弊端。刑法学界应在对包容犯进行充分的研究和比较论证的基础上来探讨这种立法例的存废。
Inclusion crime belongs to the statutory one crime and is a new form of quantity of crime in aggravated constitution of crime ; There are some clauses of inclusion crime in the new Criminal Law of China. Inclusion crime is different from other forms of one crime such as combinational crime, absorptivecrime, involved crime. Inclusion crime should be treated as the aggravated constitution of inclusion crimeaccording to the Criminal Law. The clauses of inclusion crime are to some extent based on facts and logic. They embody the pursuing of the legislature for justice and efficiency, but they also have many defects. The academic frontier of the criminal law should argue their existence or abolition on the basis offull studv and comoarison.
出处
《华南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第2期119-126,共8页
Journal of South China Agricultural University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
包容竞合
包容犯
法定—罪
inclusive coincidence
inclusion crime
statutory one crime
