摘要
对于判决书中是否应该公布少数人意见,两大法系相异的作法以及相关的学术争论对我国有可资借鉴之处。在我国,公布少数人意见有较大的现实意义可以克服合议庭评议过程中的“合而不议”和流于形式化,有助于强化法官的责任制,增强法院审判活动的公开性和透明度,提高司法的权威和公信力。在修改三大诉讼法时,应该明确规定判决书中公布少数人意见时所应该注意的问题。
We can draw lessons from the different ways with which two major legal systems deal with the minority opinions in judicial judgments. In China, the publication of minority has bigger practical significances： it can strengthen judge＇ s responsibility and publicity of court＇ s judicial activity, heighten judicial authority, etc. So it should be specified clearly in the modifying of three major procedural laws.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2006年第2期182-191,共10页
China Legal Science
