摘要
物权效力不具有立法和司法上的价值,只是一种学理上的分析解释而已。但这种解释有违立法和司法的基本逻辑,容易给人造成误解,因而不应继续沿用物权效力的概念。此外,探讨了物权请求权的名称、性质及是否适用诉讼时效,并与其他私法性救济请求权进行了比较。
The validity of the real right has no value for legislation and judicatory. It is only a kind of analytical interpretation in theory. But this interpretation is not in accordance with the logic of legislation and judicatory, and can easily mislead the audience. Therefore, the concept of the validity of the real right should not be used any more. In addition, with a study of the name and quality of the right of real claim and whether it is applicable to litigation limits, this paper compares the right of real claim with other rights of relief claim of private law.
出处
《贵州大学学报(社会科学版)》
2006年第1期43-48,共6页
Journal of Guizhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词
物权效力
物权请求权
民事责任
诉讼时效
私法性救济请求权
validity of real fight
the fight of real claim
civil liability
litigation limits
the right of relief claim of private law