摘要
我国原刑事诉讼法采用的全部卷宗移送方式因易导致法官预断而致庭审流于形式,在刑事诉讼法修改时遭到废弃。新刑事诉讼法采用的部分卷宗移送主义因其改革的不彻底性又产生了种种弊端。部分学者因之提出了借鉴“起诉状一本主义”改革我国卷宗移送方式的思路。但在我国刑事诉讼改革方向尚不明确,起诉状一本主义需要的各项配套制度尚未建立的情况下,贸然实施起诉状一本主义必然导致制度内部的冲突,甚而会因制度的反作用而产生始料未及的结果。因此,暂缓实行与我国诉讼制度适应性前景无法预料的“起诉状一本主义”,结合我国国情,重塑预审程序,实现庭审法官和预审法官的职责分离,将卷宗移送划分为向预审法官的证据移送和向庭审法官的证据移送是较为合理选择。
Old manner of deportation of files in the criminal procedure is easy get prejudgemen. The new criminal procedure law adopt the doctrine of deportation of to lead the judge to partial files to remedy this weakness. But the ending of this reform are not so good as expected. Some shcoolar suggest the Indictment-Only Doctrine. But the ending of It may cause bigger problems with regard to applying of Indictment-Only Doctrine are not easy to forcast the justice of the criminal procedure.
出处
《时代法学》
2006年第1期56-59,共4页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
卷宗移送方式
起诉状一本主义
预审程序
deportation of files
Indictment-Only Doctrine
pre-trial procedures
