摘要
我国哲学界关于价值概念的理解常有争执。20世纪80年代初至90年代初,哲学界大都是依循主体-客体模式来处理价值问题的。在这种模式中,我国价值哲学研究在取得一些成果的同时也遇到了难以解决的问题和困难。面对这些问题和困难,20世纪90年代初,哲学界开始了对主体-客体模式的反思和批判。为了超出主体-客体模式,寻求专属价值哲学的方法和思路,哲学界进行了许多有益的尝试,并提出了四种代表性的路向。但是,这四种路向从根本上说都未能超出康德关于价值概念的理解。
There often exist some arguments on the understanding of value in the academic world. From the 1980s to the early 1990s, the academic world usually deals with the problem of value according to the model of subject-object. With that model, some achievements have been reaped but at the same time some problems which are difficult to be solved have appeared, too. Facing those problems, the academic world begins to reflect on the model of subject-object from the early 1990s. Thus, In order to make a breakthrough on it and find out an exclusive method for the study of philosophy of value, the academic world has made many positive attempts and advanced four representative ways. But all the four ways don＇t surpass the Kant＇s understanding on the value.
出处
《巢湖学院学报》
2006年第2期1-7,共7页
Journal of Chaohu University
关键词
价值哲学
主体-客体模式
路向
Philosophy of Value
the model of subject-object
ways
