摘要
为完善现有框架下的认证制度,需从认证的主体、认证的前提、认证的原则和认证的制度保障等方面进行明确架构。结合诉讼法学相关理论及司法实践,认证的主体应是包括陪审员在内的审判人员,也即陪审员亦有认证权。质证是认证的前提,但综合考虑各种复杂情形,三种证据可不经过质证直接予以认证。现代自由心证原则应成为认证活动所遵循的原则。同时,应确立认证公开制度和认证异议制度来保障认证活动的科学与公正。
Authentication is a key link of the court＇s trial activity, but the approval procedure in the intact meaning has not been totally established yet. In order to perfect the approval procedure under the existing frame, respect of ensuring from the subject, prerequisite, principle, system guarantee of authentication is needed to carry on the clear framework. Considering the lawsuit relevant theories and administration of justice of law science to practice, the subject of authentication should be the personnel of trial including juror, namely the juror also has a right to certificate too; Cross- examination is a prerequisite of authentication, but considering various kinds of complicated situations synthetically, three kinds of evidences do not undergo cross-examination to give authentication directly; The card principle of modern free heart should become the principle that the authentication activity follow; Finally , authentication disclose system and authentication objection system should be established to ensure science and fairness of authentication.
出处
《延安大学学报（社会科学版）》
2006年第1期45-48,共4页
Journal of Yan'an University (Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
质证
现代自由心证
认证公开
认证异议
cross- examination
modern free heart card
authentication disclose
authentication objection
