摘要
刑事诉讼结构虽然在根本上保障了实体公正的实现 ,但刑事证据规则在功能上有效防止了控辩对抗可能引发的控辩“纠缠” ,其本质在于追求效率价值 ,核心在于禁止提出带有更大虚伪性的证据 ,是实体性规则也是可出示规则。我国现行刑事诉讼结构因较强的职权干预保证了较高的诉讼效率 ,刑事证据规则的功能在很大程度上被吸收 ,当务之急首先是完善交叉询问、举证责任等有关证据运用的程序规则以及确立带有根本意义的自由心证原则 ,刑事证据规则除已有的规定以外 ,应主要增补排除传闻证据规则。
The litigation structure is a basic guarantee of material fair. Criminal evidential rules are preventive measures to accusing and defense getting entangle. It's nature lies in seeking efficiency and prohibition of producing more sham proof. It is material rule form a contrast with litigation structure, producible rule of evidence. Litigation structure of our country in effect has ensured a very high efficiency of lawsuit, need not evidential rule on the whole. It is urgent matter that perfect procedural rule of utilizing evidence, such as the rule of cross examination, burden of adducing evidence, free evaluation of evidence through inner conviction provided with basic significance, and so on. Besides evidential rules provided the rule against hearsay is main augment. Drawing up a lead evidence code is a selection from the angle of the development of litigation structure.
出处
《甘肃政法学院学报》
2002年第5期1-7,共7页
Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute
关键词
刑事证据规则
价值
实现
Criminal evidential rule
Value
Realization
