摘要
现行合同法对房屋承租人的保护主要体现在两方面:一是赋予房屋承租人优先购买权;二是“买卖不破租赁”。但房屋承租人的优先购买权虽是一项法定权利,承租人行使优先购买权的具体条件和方式,在实践中往往缺乏操作性,并且现实中鲜有发生;《合同法》第229条规定的“买卖不破租赁”已经能够有效保障承租人的权利。况且,随着我国住房制度的深入改革与房地产交易活动的频繁,这样的偏向性法律保护势必妨碍和限制私权,有悖于现代民法的精神。故笔者认为,在将来修改、完善法律时应当删除230条,从立法上取缔对房屋承租人优先购买权的保护。
The lessee＇ s preemptive fight over the leased building is a legal right provided by PRC Contract Law. When the landlord sells the leased building, the lessee can exercise its preemptive right with the ＂same conditions＂ provided by the contract between the landlord and the third person. How should the lessee exercise its preemptive right？ In fact, it is hardly possible for the lessee to exercise its preemptive right in accordance with the current laws. Moreover, ＂validity of the lease contract vs. the ownership＇s change＂ stipulated in the 229th article of the PRC Contract Law already effectively protects the lessee＇ s right. In addition, preemptive right is short of theoretical support. As a result, the author proposes that the lessee＇ s preemptive fight should be expurgated when this law is revised in the future.
出处
《西南农业大学学报（社会科学版）》
2005年第4期93-96,共4页
Journal of Southwest Agricultural University:Social Science Edition
关键词
房屋租赁
承租人
优先购买权
买卖不破租赁
取缔
leased house
lessee
preemptive fight
validity of the lease contract vs. the ownership＇ s change
expurgate
