期刊文献+

房地产上市公司经营效率的DEA评价 被引量:28

Evaluation of the Operational Efficiency of Listed Real Estate Companies by DEA
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章运用数据包络分析的CRS和VRS模型,对我国证券市场有代表性的49家房地产上市公司2004年的经营效率进行了分析与评价。通过对各上市公司的技术效率、纯技术效率、规模效率及其规模效益状况的分析得出:从整体上看,我国房地产上市公司的经营发展水平处于上升阶段;在目前经营规模上的经营效率比较高;整体上基本接近规模有效;大部分的上市公司处于规模收益递减区间。 The steady development of the real estate industry is an academic focus in recent years. In order to suppress the overheated investment in real estate, the country issues and implements a series of relevant policies to “lower the temperature” and they make the real estate developer's funding and operational liabilities encounter the bottleneck. In precarious situation of macro adjustments and controls, how on earth the circumstances of the listed real estate companies are is a question that investors in security market and government's policymakers pay close attention to. In this paper, we analyzes and evaluate the operational efficiency of 49 representative listed companies in field of real estate in 2004 by using CRS model and VRS model of data envelopment analysis. And we calculate technological efficiency, pure technological efficiency, scale efficiency of all DMUs and their scale efficiency return situations and draw some conclusions: As a whole, the management development level of the listed real estate companies of our country is at the stage of rising; their operational efficiency under the current business scale is higher than past; It is close to the effective scale on the whole; most listed companies are in the interval of diminishing returns to scale.
出处 《统计与信息论坛》 2006年第1期74-78,共5页 Journal of Statistics and Information
关键词 房地产企业 经营效率 DEA 线性规划 中国 规模效益 real estate operational efficiency data envelopment analysis linear programming
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献34

  • 1魏权龄,岳明.DEA概论与C^2R模型——数据包络分析(一)[J].系统工程理论与实践,1989,9(1):58-69. 被引量:213
  • 2魏权龄.评价相对有效性的DEA方法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1988.218-257. 被引量:125
  • 3Lewin A Y, Minton J W. Determining organizational effectiveness: A nother look, and an agenda for research[J]. Management Science, 1986,32:514-5 53. 被引量:1
  • 4Bagozzi R P, Phillips L W. Representing and testing organizational theorie s: A holistic construal[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1982,17:459-489 被引量:1
  • 5Chakravarthy B S. Measuring strategic performance[J]. Strategic Manageme nt Journal, 1986,7:437-458. 被引量:1
  • 6Argenti J. Corporate collapse: the cause and symptoms[M]. Wiley, New Yor k, 1976. 被引量:1
  • 7Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision maki ng units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978,2:429-444. 被引量:1
  • 8Zhu J. Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fort une 500 companies[J]. European Journal of Operation Research, 2000,123:105-12 4 被引量:1
  • 9Zhu J. Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: da ta envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA Excel Solver[M]. Boston: Klu wer Academic, 2003. 被引量:1
  • 10Andersen P, Petersen N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis[J]. Management Science, 1993,39:1261-1264. 被引量:1

共引文献183

同被引文献160

引证文献28

二级引证文献106

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部