期刊文献+

房屋拆迁权行使的正当性研究 被引量:1

Legitimacy Research on Executing House Removal Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 按照行政权理论,房屋拆迁行政裁量权从性质上属于侵益性行为,法律应当将其设计为羁束行为,或者是羁束裁量行为。我国《城市房屋拆迁管理条例》将其设计为自由裁量行为,将房屋拆迁个别案件的判断和处理授权给行政部门,期待行政主体以其自身的责任进行政策性应对或自由判断,其局限性与危险性在于其容易被滥用。应当从立法上确立拆迁权行使的正当性标准,并将其纳入司法审查领域。 According to the administration theory, the administrative decisions of house removal fall into benefit-distorted behavior in nature. It should be designed by law as a limited act or a limited discretional act. However, the Regulation of Administration of Urban House Removal designs it as a discretional act, which gives the authority of judging and managing the cases of house removal to the administration institutions and expects the subjects of administration to take appropriate administrative measures or make free judgments within their own responsibilities. Therefore this right can be easily misused or abused. Justifiable standard of house removal right should be set up by legislation and categorized into the field of judicial review.
作者 董娟 陈士俊
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第1期27-31,共5页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
关键词 房屋拆迁 正当性 裁量行为 dismantlement and removal of housing legitimacy discretional act
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

共引文献259

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部