期刊文献+

综合性卒中单元对急性脑卒中患者近期预后的影响 被引量:11

The advantages in combined stroke unit for acute stroke patients in near future
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨综合性卒中单元对急性脑卒中患者近期预后的影响。方法:选综合性卒中单元的急性脑卒中患者206例为治疗组。神经科常规病房的急性卒中患者207例为对照组。比较两组主要临床指标。结果:治疗组21天感染发生率7.79%,病死率6.3%,其中非颅内病变死亡占30.8%,而对照组分别为17.4%、8.7%、61.1%,除病死率差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)外,其他差异都具有显著性意义(P<0.01)。两组21天神经功能评分差异无显著性意义(P>0.05)。随访90天改良的Rankin积分两组差异具有显著性意义(P<0.01)。结论:急性卒中患者可以从综合性卒中单元的医疗模式中获益,并能提高非生活依赖和回归社会的比例。 Objective: To evaluate the advantages of combined stroke unit for acute stroke patients in near future. Method: The data of 206 acute stroke patients managed within combined stroke unit(A) group were compared with that of 207 acute stroke patients treated in commonly neurological ward(B) group. The patients with hemiplegia were diagnosed by CT or MRI. Result: There were significant differences between A group and B group at 21days in the rate of infection (7.76% vs 17.4%), P〈0.01. There were not significant differences between A group and B group at 21days in the rate of mortality(6.3% vs 8.7%), P〉0.05.But there were significant differences between A group and B group in rate of no-cerebral causes for death (30.8% vs 61.1%), P〈0.01. And also, the scores of Chinese Stroke Scale at 21 days were not significantly different between two groups, P〉0.05. As well as Modified Rankin Scale at 90 days were significantly different between two groups, P〈0.01. Conclusion: Combining acute and rehabilitation services in a Stroke Unit may reduce the rate of infection, may reduce the rate of no-cerebral causes for death and improve functional outcome of patients with acute stroke at 90d.
出处 《中国康复医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2005年第11期827-829,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
关键词 急性脑卒中 综合性卒中单元 康复 acute stroke rehabilitation combined stroke unit
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jorgensen HS,Nakayama H,Raaschou HO, et al. The effect of a stroke unit: reductions in mortality, discharge rate to nursing home, length of hospital stay, and eost [J]. Stroke,1995,26:1178-1182. 被引量:1
  • 2Ronning OM, Guldvog B. Stroke units versus general medical wards, I: Twelve- and eighteen-month survival: a randomised,controlled trial[J]. Stroke, 1998,29: 58-62. 被引量:1
  • 3Indredavik B, Bakke F, Solberg R, et al. Benefit of a stroke unit: a randomised controlled trial[J]. Stroke, 1991,22: 1026-1031. 被引量:1
  • 4中华医学会全国第四届脑血管病学术会议.脑卒中患者临床神经功能缺损评分标准(1995)[J].中华神经科杂志,1996,29:379-379. 被引量:3
  • 5Indredavik B, Bakke F, Slordahl SA, et al. Treatment in a combined acute and rehabilitation stoke Unit: which aspects are most important[J]?Stroke, 1999,30:917-923. 被引量:1
  • 6Gatti JC. Which interventions help to prevent falls in the elderly[J]? Am Fam Physician,2002,1,65(11):2259-2260. 被引量:1
  • 7Wolfe CDA, Taub NA, Woodrow E J, et al. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients [J]. Stroke,1991,22:1242-1244. 被引量:1
  • 8Adnan IQ, Fareed KS, Jawad FK,et al. The relative impact of inadequate primary and secondary prevention on cardiovascular mortality in United States[J]. Stroke,2004,35: 2346-2350. 被引量:1
  • 9WemerHacke.Stroke Units in Germany[C]..上海“卒中单元”国际研讨会[C].上海,2004.. 被引量:1
  • 10吴升平 王文志.中国脑卒中流行病学特征及其发展趋势[C]..天坛国际脑血管病会议论文汇编[C].,2004.93. 被引量:3

二级参考文献10

  • 1Ole Morten Ronning, Bjorn Guldvog. Stroke Units Versus General Medical Wards, Ⅰ: Twelve- and Eighteen- Month Survival. Stroke, 1998,29:58~62 被引量:1
  • 2Treib J, Grauer MT, Woessner R, et al. Treatment of stroke on an intensive stroke unit: a novel concept. Intensive Care Med, 2000, 26(11):1598~ 1611 被引量:1
  • 3Indredavik B, Bakke F, Slordahl SA, et al. Treatment in a Combined Acute and Rehabilitation Stoke Unit. Stoke, 1999, 30:917~923 被引量:1
  • 4Ole Morten Ronning, Bjorn Guldvog. Stroke Unit Versus General Medical Wards, Ⅱ: Neurological Deficits and Activities of Daily Living.Stroke, 1998, 29: 586~ 590 被引量:1
  • 5Glader EL, Stegmayr B, Johansson L. Differences in long- term outcome between patients treated in stroke units and in general wards: a 2- year follow up of stroke patients in sweden. Stroke, 2001,32 (9):2124~2130 被引量:1
  • 6Henrik Stig Jorgensen, Lars Peter Kammersgaard, Jakob Houth, et al.Who Benefits From Treatment and Rehabilitation in a Stroke Unit?Stroke, 2000, 31:434 被引量:1
  • 7Duncan G, Ritchie LC, Jamieson DM, et al. Acute stroke in South Ayrshire: comparative study of pre and post stroke units. Health Bull(Edinb), 1995, 53(3): 159~ 166 被引量:1
  • 8Kalra L, Evans A, Perez I, et al. Alternative strategies for stroke care:a prospective randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2000, 356(9233):894~899 被引量:1
  • 9秦震.急性缺血性脑血管病临床治疗研究近况[J].中华神经科杂志,1998,31(6):367-369. 被引量:36
  • 10陈立云,李义召.全国第五届脑血管疾病学术会议纪要[J].山东医药,2000,40(1):45-46. 被引量:22

共引文献83

同被引文献59

引证文献11

二级引证文献40

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部