期刊文献+

沈阳市新贫困人群生命质量调查 被引量:3

A survey on the quality of life of the new urban poverty in Shenyang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价城市新贫困人群的生命质量,并探讨其主要影响因素。方法用SF-36量表对某社区103名新贫困人口的生命质量进行评价,采用logistic回归分析生命质量的主要影响因素。结果患病、医疗花费、债务、性别、文化程度对新贫困人群的生理健康有影响;债务对心理健康有影响。36~50岁人群中,新贫困人群的生理功能、社会功能、精神健康、活力、总体健康等维度高于贫困组;全部维度均低于非贫困组。结论SF-36量表适用于城市新贫困人群。对于36~50岁组人群,新贫困人群的生命质量接近于贫困人群,但低于非贫困人群。 Objective To evaluate the quality of life of new urban poverty, and to investigate the influencing factors. Methods SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate the life quality of 103 new urban poverty. Logistic regression analysis was applied to find out influencing factors. Results Sickness, medical cost, debt, sex and eduational level were influencing factors of physical health. Debt had effect on mental health. SF-36 scores of the new urban poverty were higher than that of poor group, and lower than that of non-poor group in the group aged 36-50. Conclusions The SF-36 health survey could be suitable for the new urban poverty. For the group aged 36-50, the quality of life of new urban poverty was close to that of poor people, but lower than that of non-pcor People.
出处 《疾病控制杂志》 2005年第5期396-399,共4页 Chinese Journal of Disease Control and Prevention
关键词 贫困区 生活质量 Poverty areas Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献16

  • 1Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12. 被引量:1
  • 2Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060. 被引量:1
  • 3Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432. 被引量:1
  • 4Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959. 被引量:1
  • 5顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119. 被引量:1
  • 6Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147. 被引量:1
  • 7Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138. 被引量:1
  • 8Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283. 被引量:1
  • 9Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412. 被引量:1
  • 10Armor DJ.Theta reliability and factor scaling.In: Costner HL, ed.Sociological Methodology:1973-74.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1974.17-50. 被引量:1

共引文献2196

同被引文献18

  • 1王红妹,李鲁.初级卫生保健中慢性病对健康相关生命质量的影响[J].中国全科医学,2004,7(19):1439-1442. 被引量:15
  • 2刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].高血压杂志,2004,12(6):483-486. 被引量:368
  • 3李立明,饶克勤,孔灵芝,姚崇华,向红丁,翟凤英,马冠生,杨晓光,中国居民营养与健康状况调查技术执行组.中国居民2002年营养与健康状况调查[J].中华流行病学杂志,2005,26(7):478-484. 被引量:1782
  • 4张训保,卓朗,周益跃,耿德勤,苗春霞,黄水平,刘沛,钱伟靖.城市低保与非低保人员的心理卫生状况[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(42):53-53. 被引量:8
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南(试行)[s].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003. 被引量:1
  • 6World Health Organization. World Health Organization definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complica- tions. Report of a WHO Consultation Part 1. Diagnosis and classi- fication of diabetes meUitus [ R ]. Geneva, 1999. 被引量:1
  • 7Fonseca V,Bakris GL,Benjamin EA,et al. for the American Dia- betes Association Professional Practice Committee. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus [ J ]. Diabetes Care, 2006,29 ( suppl 1 ) :43 -48. 被引量:1
  • 8Kontodimopoulos N, Pappa E, Niakas D, et al. Validity of SF-12summary scores in a Greek general population [ J]. Health QualLife Outcomes, 2007,5:55. 被引量:1
  • 9Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health surveyvalid and equivalent for a Chinese population? [ J ]. Qual LifeRes, 2005,14(2) :539-547. 被引量:1
  • 10Luo X,Lynn George M, Kakouras I,et al. Reliability, validityand responsiveness of the short form 12-item survey (SF-12) inpatients with back pain [ J]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976 ),2003 ,28(15):1739-1745. 被引量:1

引证文献3

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部