摘要
“量”否定的结果与词序的关联标记模式具有语用、认知动因。否定词与被否定对象的次序是动宾结构的隐喻表现;量否定的结果是“足量原则”和“量级隐含”共同作用的结果。此模式中应加上对被否定成分的指称的考虑,因为只有对有指的名词短语才能进行全量否定,对无指的量化名词短语只能进行部分否定。否定极性成分在动词前后的理解机制一致,都是对代表主观最小量的无指名词短语的否定已达到对全量的否定。全称量词有两个侧面,在动词后接近无指,在话题位置接近定指,因此否定结果不同。
The result of quantitative negation and the relevance-marking model are of pragmatic and cognitive motives. While negative words and the order of the negated objects are metaphorical in the pattern of predication, quantitative negation is the co-occurrence of the sufficiency principle and quantitative implication principle. The writer claims that the deictic negation should also be taken into consideration, namely, the noun phrase with index can be completely negated, and that without index can be only partially negated. The negation of polarity enjoys the same understanding regardless of the preverbal or post-verb quantitative particles.
出处
《河北师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2005年第6期73-80,共8页
Journal of Hebei Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
