期刊文献+

进口国制度安排与高技术产品出口:基于引力模型的研究 被引量:26

Institutional Arrangement of Import Countries and Hi-tech Products Export: A Research Based on the Gravity Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 以往关于制度因素对贸易流量影响的研究,只停留在对单个制度变量探讨的层面上,为弥补这种不足,本文采用CES函数,推导了包含制度安排变量的引力模型,然后采用中国、美国、日本、韩国和巴西高技术产品出口的面板数据检验了该引力模型。检验结果显示,就制度安排总体而言,美国和日本的高技术产品出口对进口国制度安排的敏感性要高于中国、韩国和巴西,五个国家对进口国非正式约束制度安排的敏感性均较强;就各项制度安排而言,美国和日本的高技术产品出口对进口国正式约束的制度安排影响的敏感性相对较强,而中国和巴西对进口国实施特征方面的制度安排影响的敏感性相对较强。同时各项制度安排对不同国家不同大类的高技术产品的影响表现出很强的相异性,这反映了各国各大类高技术产品出口各自的特征。 The past researches on the impact of institutional factors on trade flow only focus on individual institutions with no systematized and theoretical analysis. This paper, based upon Anderson (1979) and CES function, deduces the gravity model including institutional arrangement factors. The gravity model is then examined by using the panel data of hi-tech products export of China, USA, Japan, South Korea and Brazil. The result reveals that, hi-tech products export of USA and Japan are more sensitive to the institutional arrangement of import countries than China, South Korea and Brazil, while the five countries are more sensitive to the informal institutional arrangement of import countries. In terms of the specific institutional arrangements, American and Japanese hi-tech products export are more sensitive to the formal rules of institutional arrangements of import countries, whereas Chinese and Brazilian hi-tech products export are more sensitive to the enforcement and operating characteristics of institutional arrangements of import countries.
出处 《世界经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2005年第9期3-16,80,共15页 The Journal of World Economy
基金 国家社会科学重点项目(04AJL006) 博士点基金(20030532022) 商务部科技兴贸专项资金资助。
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

二级参考文献79

  • 1杨小凯,张永生.新贸易理论、比较利益理论及其经验研究的新成果:文献综述[J].经济学(季刊),2001(1):19-44. 被引量:185
  • 2诺斯.《经济史中的结构与变迁》(中译本)[M].上海三联出版社,1994.. 被引量:2
  • 3德姆塞茨.《所有权,控制与企业》(中译本)[M].经济科学出版社,(1999).. 被引量:1
  • 4Anderson, James E. and Wineoop, Eric van. "Borders,Trade and Welfare. " NBER Working Paper No. 8515, 2001. 被引量:1
  • 5Balassa, Bela. "Exports, Policy Choices, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries after the 1973 Oil Shock. "Journal of Development Economics, 1985, 18, pp. 23-35. 被引量:1
  • 6Coase, Ronald H. "The Nature of the Firm. " Economics,1937, 4, pp. 386-405. 被引量:1
  • 7Cyrus, Teresa L. "lneome in the Gravity Model of Bilateral Trade: Does Endogeneity Matter?" The International Trade Journal, 2002, 2, pp. 161-180. 被引量:1
  • 8Deardorff, V. Alar. "Determinants of Bilateral Trade: Does Gravity Work in a Neoclassic World?" NBER Working Paper No. 5377, 1995. 被引量:1
  • 9Dixit, A. and Stiglitz, J. "Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. " American Economic Review, 1977,67, pp. 297-308. 被引量:1
  • 10Frankel, Jeffrey A. and Romer, David. "Does Trade Cause Growth?" American Economic Review, 1999, 7, pp. 379-399. 被引量:1

共引文献396

同被引文献313

引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部