期刊文献+

《段注》与《广韵》

Comparison Between the Two Chinese Classical Books Duan-zhu and Guang-yun
下载PDF
导出
摘要 段玉裁《说文解字注》引用《广韵》中大量训诂资料,求证《说文》本字本义,纠正今本《说文》的讹误,力图恢复古本《说文》的原貌,同时用历史的眼光审察《广韵》,把《说文》释义与《广韵》释义进行比照,以《说文》本义为主线来贯通《广韵》中的引申义与假借义以及古今词义的差异,纠正《广韵》的释义之误。 Quoting a great deal of explanatory material from Guang- yun ( 《广韵》 ), Shu - wen Jie - zi Zhu( 《说文解字注》)by Duan Yu- cai, tries to find out the original meanings of words paraphrased in Shuo - wen (《说文》) in a hope to correct the errors in today's edition. Moreover, the book gives a contrast between the explanations of Shuo- wen, which mainly focuses on the meanings of word itself and Guang - yun which, instead, sometimes on the extended or borrowed meanings with more or less inaccuracy between ancient and modem words.
作者 毛毓松
出处 《盐城师范学院学报(人文社会科学版)》 2005年第3期98-101,共4页 Journal of Yancheng Teachers University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 《说文解字注》 《广韵》 本义 引申义 假借义 Shu - wen Jie - zi Zhu Guang - yun original meanings extended meanings borrowed meaning
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

  • 1[1]余行达.说文段注研究[M].成都:巴蜀书社,1988. 被引量:1
  • 2汤可敬.说文解字今释[M].长沙:岳麓书社,1997.. 被引量:7
  • 3朱骏声.说文通训定声[M].武汉:武汉古籍书店,1983:746. 被引量:19

共引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部