摘要
英国实行独特的二元化律师制度,事务律师与出庭律师共同为社会提供法律服务,但二者在执业资格取得、出庭权、行业组织、晋升法官的机会等方面有着传统区分。自二十世纪六十年代末期以来,政府开始介入一直自律发展的律师业,制定和推行了一系列打破传统分界的立法与改革举措,由此引发了人们关于律师业是否应当融合以及最终能否融合的争议。或许是否融合只是表面现象,律师分立的传统行业规则带来的弊端才是促使政府推行改革的真正动力。
The legal profession in England and Wales is unique with its dual divisions.Solicitors and barristers both provide legal services,but there are traditional differences in their calling to the bar,right of audience,disciplinary organization,opportunity of admission to judiciary,etc.Since the late 1960s,when the government started to interfere in the self-disciplined legal profession,a series of legislations and reforms towards breaking down the division have been made,which has led to controversies over the justification and possibility of the integration of the professions.Perhaps the integration is only a superficial problem.Behind it lie the demerits brought by the dual division and its traditional provisional bad practices that are the real target of the governments reform.
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第4期173-178,共6页
Modern Law Science
