期刊文献+

从后现代视角论师生关系重构 被引量:29

Teacher-student Relations from the View of Post-modernism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 现代师生关系奉行的是师生主客二元对立、教师中心和权威、培养规格的统一性等理念,师生之间是支配与被支配的关系。这种不平等不仅会造成师生之间的对立、冲突,也会造成学生片面发展。后现代师生关系则以批判现代理性教育观和认识论为哲学基础,主张建立非理性的、情感约定的师生关系。师生之间具有同等的话语权,在民主平等、合作对话的过程中共同成为知识的创造者。师生之间建立起以生活实践为基础的人际关系,彼此之间既有充分的自由又有对对方的负责,是自由、责任和权利的统一。师生之间在教育和学习中经历共同生命发展的过程,最终形成健康的情感和人格,达到生命的完整。后现代主义的师生关系向人们展现了一种开放的、多元的、新颖的师生关系。 Modern teacher-student relations emphasize teachers’ authority, central place and the contrast between students and teachers. Such an unfair controlling relation can cause conflicts and contradiction between them as well as the uncompleted development of students. Post-modern teacher-student relations, based on criticizing modern rational educational concept. It advocates establishing irrational affective teacher-student relations. Teachers and students have equal rights to speak. They are all the creators of knowledge in the process of cooperative teaching and learning.The relations between teachers and students are based on practice. Full freedom and responsibility between teachers and students are the unity of freedom, responsibility and power. The relation is based on the mutual development of education and learning. As a result, healthy affect and characters are formed and life's completeness is achieved. The post-modern teacher-student relations reflect open, complex and new teacher-student relation. By absorbing its reasonable parts and dealing with its contradictions and shortcomings, it has enlightening significance towards the modern educational reform in our country.
作者 周思旭
出处 《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 北大核心 2005年第3期176-179,共4页 Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 后现代 现代 师生关系 post-modernism modernism teacher-student relations
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献14

  • 1雅斯贝尔斯 邹进(译).什么是教育[M].三联书店出版社,1991.33. 被引量:121
  • 2金生鲅.理解与教育——走向哲学解释学的教育哲学[M].北京:教育科学出版社,1997.. 被引量:1
  • 3[美1 J 威廉姆E 多尔.后现代课程观[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2000.. 被引量:1
  • 4麦克·F·D·扬.知识与控制——教育社会学新探[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2002.. 被引量:1
  • 5齐格蒙·鲍曼.生活在碎片之中[M].上海:学林出版社,2002.50.225.64.311-312.序9. 被引量:4
  • 6齐格蒙·鲍曼.现代性与大屠杀[M].南京:译林出版社,2002.238. 被引量:11
  • 7Brambaugh, Robert S. 1982, Whitehead, Process Philosophy and Educatum, Statc of New York. 被引量:1
  • 8Evans, Malcolm, 1998, Whitehead and Philosophy of Education, Atlanta, Amsterdan. 被引量:1
  • 9Rorty, Richard, 1991, "Is Derrida a Transcendental Philosopher?", in Essays on Heidegger and Others, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. 被引量:1
  • 10Whitehead,A.N.,1929,Process and Reality,New York:Macmillam Company.(参见中国城市出版社2003年版). 被引量:1

共引文献166

同被引文献213

引证文献29

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部