摘要
本文通过对史料的梳理和分析比照 ,发现西南夷之“夷”这一概念在《史记》中的含义与语境同《后汉书》、《华阳国志》两书存在明显差异。在《史记》的语境中 ,“夷”是对西南各部落人群的一个泛称 ,而在《后汉书》和《华阳国志》中“夷”则演成一个明确的族属类别称谓。本文就造此变化的原因及所涉及的相关问题作了讨论 ,指出《后汉书》和《华阳国志》中“夷”作为与“氐”、“羌”、“越”相并列的族属类别称谓出现之事实 ,对我们进一步认识“西南夷”部落人群之族系面貌有重要意义 ,值得引起高度重视。
On the basis of contrasting and analysing relative materials,the author finds that there is an obvious difference about the concept,“Yi” of soufhwest ethnics,in annal“SHi Ji”(“Records of Historian”)and in other two annals“Hou Han SHu”and “Hua Yang Guo ZHi”,In the former book,“Yi” is an extensive form of address to all ethnics in southwest,while“Yi” has envolved a concrtete ethnic form of address in the latter books.This article discusses reasons of the change as well as relative problems.The author points out it's true that“Yi” appears in “Hou Han SHu”and“Hua Yang Guo ZHi”as an equal form of address with some ethnics like“Di”,“Qiang”,“Yue”.This is greatly significant for us to further realize physiognomy of clan family of southwest ethnics and worth highly valuing.
出处
《贵州民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第1期124-130,共7页
Guizhou Ethnic Studies
关键词
西南夷
夷
羌
越
southwest ethnics
“Yi”
Qiang
Yue
