摘要
马克思关于“个人全面发展”的理念是他哲学思想的一个重要组成部分。我国理论界历来重视研究马克思的这一理念 ,但却以潜移默化的方式把“个人全面发展”的提法转换成“人的全面发展”的提法。本文强调 ,这两种提法是有重要差异的 ,马克思说的“个人全面发展”是有严格的理论含义的。本文分析了这种“转换”的成因 ,同时也肯定了我国理论界在研究这一问题上所做出的贡献。此外 ,本文也指出 ,马克思的异化理论有两个维度———道德维度和历史维度 ,以往的研究普遍地拘执于道德维度 ,从而遮蔽了马克思对“普遍异化”的历史意义的肯定。
Marx's idea of the universal development of individuals is an important part of his whole philosophical thought. The theoretical kingdom of China has been stressing to investigate this idea, but transform from “the universal development of individuals' into “the human universal development'. According to my opinion, There is a remarkable difference between these two expressions and Marx's idea of the universal development of individuals has a strict theoretical implication. This paper analyses the causes of the “transformation', also affirms the fact that the theoretical kingdom of China has made certain contributions in study of this theme. In addition, this paper points out that Marx's theory of alienation has two dimensions: one is moral, the other historical, and that previous researches focused on the moral dimension of alienation, looking down upon its historical dimension Marx makes high assessment.
出处
《学术界》
2001年第5期11-16,共6页
Academics
关键词
全面发展
理念
严格
中国
个人
转换
实践
马克思
理论界
问题
the universal development of individuals
the human universal development
transformation
moral dimension of alienation
historical dimension of alienation
