摘要
目的:引进和评价家庭系统测验(FAST)的信度、效度及其适用性。方法:对北京市三所中学的212名初高中各年级学生个别施测后,再用家庭亲密度和适应性量表中文版(FACESII-CV)和家庭环境量表中文版(FES-CV)的两个分量表集体施测,分析FAST在北京试用的信度和效度。结果:FAST的亲密度和权力等级两个维度上,间隔1周的重测信度分别为0.93和0.85。亲密度维度与FACESII-CV、FES-CV相应分量表的相关系数分别是0.55和0.47。与结构家庭理论相一致,多数家庭表现出高度的亲密和中度的权力等级,构成平衡的家庭结构,且不同情境下FAST得分不同(P<0.05)。与家庭发展观点相一致,高中组亲密度得分低于初中组(P<0.05)。表明FAST具有较好的重测信度、效标效度和结构效度。结论:该量表具有较好的信度和效度,是评估家庭结构简便、可靠而有效的工具。
Objective:To develop and test the reliability, validity and applicability of Family System Test. Methods:212 subjects of different grades from three middle schools in Beijing were tested with FAST by individual. They also completed Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale-Chinese Version ( FACEII-CV ) and two subscales of Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version ( FES-CV ) by group. The reliability and validity of FAST were calculated. Results:The test-retest coefficients for 1 week interval of dimension 'cohesion' and 'hierarchy' of FAST were 0.93 and 0.85. The correlation coefficients between dimension 'cohesion' of FAST and corresponding subscales of FACEII-CV and FES-CV were 0.55 and 0.47 respectively. In accord with structural family theory, most families showed high cohesion, medium hierarchy and balance family structure and there were significant different between of the scores of FAST in different representations. In accord with developmental family perspective, senior high school students portrayed less cohesion than juniors (p<0.05 ) . The results suggested FAST had adequate test-retest reliability, criterion-re-lated validity and construct validity. Conclusion:With adequate reliability and validity, FAST is a conve-nient, reliable and effective tool for assessing family structures .
出处
《中国心理卫生杂志》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2005年第1期45-48,共4页
Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词
家庭系统测验
FAST
试修订
精神卫生
家庭结构
mental health family system test psychometric studies family structures reliability validity
