摘要
针对把“以事实为根据 ,以法律为准绳”原则中的“事实”理解为“客观事实”的抽象化作法 ,提出以事实为根据中的“事实”是指诉讼中的“案件事实”,而不是哲学范畴中的“客观事实”。同时 ,针对三大诉讼所追求的价值目标相异 。
Seeing that there existing a theory that the 'facts' in the principle of 'Having the facts as basis and the law as criteria' are the 'objective facts' which is abstract and simple practice,here it advances that the 'facts' referred to in 'Having the facts as basis' should be the 'case facts',but not the 'objective facts' in philosophical meanig.Meanwhile,considering that the three main lawsuits aim at different targets,the theory which should be diffrent testifying criteria on 'case facts' used in judging cases in different lawsuits was presented.
出处
《长安大学学报（社会科学版）》
2001年第2期42-45,共4页
Journal of Chang'an University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
诉讼法
客观事实
案件事实
法律推定
证明标准
procedural law
objective facts
case facts
legal inference
testifying criteria
